Patient prompts in surgical consultations: A systematic review

医学 梅德林 数据提取 随机对照试验 家庭医学 系统回顾 患者满意度 召回 报告偏差 患者参与 护理部 外科 语言学 哲学 政治学 法学
作者
Ying Yang Ting,Jesse Ey,Ellie Treloar,Jessica Reid,Emma L. Bradshaw,Guy J. Maddern
出处
期刊:Surgery [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:172 (6): 1759-1767 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2022.08.031
摘要

Quality communication has been found to improve patient outcomes. Despite good communication, information may still be forgotten or misunderstood by patients. A question prompt list is a document to help patients ask questions. Question prompt lists are well perceived by various stakeholders and have been found of benefit to patients. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of patient question prompting documents in surgical outpatient consultations.MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO were searched on September 13, 2021. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. We included English studies that investigated the use of question prompt lists and their influence on patient outcomes. We excluded studies that did not have a comparator group. Because of heterogeneity of outcome measures, meta-analysis was precluded. This study was registered with PROSPERO (identification number: CRD42021279058).Searches identified 107 suitable studies; however, only 7 studies met eligibility criteria. All included studies were randomized controlled trials, but the designs of studies were heterogenous. Three out of 7 included studies were at a high risk of bias. The included studies investigated different outcomes that could be broadly categorized into 5 themes: consultation characteristics, patient engagement, patient well-being, information exchange, and patient satisfaction. None of the studies looked at patient recall of information. Aside from length of consultation, the overall results for each category were mixed.Current literature has suggested that question prompt lists are a low-risk intervention that could improve patient engagement and patient-doctor communication; however, there is limited evidence at present to conclusively promote their usage in perioperative surgical consultations.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
ding应助向日葵采纳,获得10
1秒前
开朗筮发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
Helen发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
沉静蘑菇发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
zz发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
sunchaoyue发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
无花果应助lsx采纳,获得10
2秒前
可爱的函函应助陈晨采纳,获得10
4秒前
超勍发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
坚定的玉米完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
许师傅发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
吧唧发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
a桃发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
bboo完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
沉静蘑菇完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
寄语明月发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
小甜甜发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
JamesPei应助小心胖虎采纳,获得10
9秒前
Orange应助zz采纳,获得10
9秒前
Jame发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
12秒前
swzswz发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
小七完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
Owen应助阿莫仙采纳,获得10
13秒前
可爱的函函应助Ttt采纳,获得10
14秒前
1111完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
超勍完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
陈晨完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
酷波er应助上进采纳,获得10
15秒前
王杰发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
高分求助中
Разработка метода ускоренного контроля качества электрохромных устройств 500
Chinesen in Europa – Europäer in China: Journalisten, Spione, Studenten 500
Arthur Ewert: A Life for the Comintern 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi // Kurt Werner Radtke 500
Two Years in Peking 1965-1966: Book 1: Living and Teaching in Mao's China // Reginald Hunt 500
Epigenetic Drug Discovery 500
Politiek-Politioneele Overzichten van Nederlandsch-Indië. Bronnenpublicatie, Deel II 1929-1930 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3819229
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3362344
关于积分的说明 10416435
捐赠科研通 3080506
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1694531
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 814686
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 768388