机会主义
模棱两可
公司治理
波动性(金融)
业务
模式(遗传算法)
产业组织
微观经济学
经济
计算机科学
财务
市场经济
机器学习
程序设计语言
作者
Stephen J. Carson,Anoop Madhok,Tao Wu
标识
DOI:10.5465/amj.2006.22798187
摘要
Comparing the effectiveness of contractual and relational governance in constraining opportunism under conditions of volatility and ambiguity, we hypothesize that relational contracts will be robust to volatility but not to ambiguity, whereas formal contracts will be robust to ambiguity but not to volatility. Data from 125 interorganizational relationships involving R&D for new-product development support these hypotheses. Our findings suggest that formal and relational contracts each have advantages and disadvantages in specific situations and are not simply substitutes. Our results challenge the view that relational contracts are resistant to opportunism. A revised comparative governance schema is theorized for future research.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI