电解质
材料科学
氧化物
非阻塞I/O
固体氧化物燃料电池
兴奋剂
镧
阳极
相(物质)
锶
图层(电子)
化学工程
无机化学
分析化学(期刊)
化学
冶金
电极
纳米技术
光电子学
物理化学
催化作用
有机化学
工程类
生物化学
色谱法
作者
S. Geethan Kumar,Abhilash Chakraborty,Sushobhan Kobi,P. Gopalan,T. R. S. Prasanna
摘要
Abstract In strontium‐ and magnesium‐doped LaGaO 3 (LSGM) electrolyte‐based solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC), lanthanum‐doped CeO 2 (LDC) is usually used as buffer layer material to prevent reactions between LSGM electrolyte and NiO‐based anode. In literature, based on results for one particular LSGM composition, a fixed buffer layer composition of 40% La‐doped ceria (LDC40) has been used even with electrolytes of different LSGM compositions. In this study, we report the results of a comprehensive study of phase formations between various LSGM and LDC compositions. Our results show that only one LSGM/LDC combination results in no additional phases. For the other combinations, at least one and often two additional phases, LaSrGaO 4 and LaSrGa 3 O 7 , result. Because LaSrGa 3 O 7 has much lower conductivity, it is necessary to select combinations that avoid this phase. We propose that the combination that results in no additional phase should be considered favorably for SOFCs. For other LSGM compositions, LDC50 should be used as a buffer layer instead of LDC40 as is presently done in SOFC studies. Alternately, if LDC40 is preferred for buffer layer, then lower Sr content LSGM compositions should be used as electrolytes. These combinations are likely to lead to better long‐term SOFC performance.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI