心理学
脑磁图
模式
神经影像学
脑电图
神经科学
大脑活动与冥想
神经功能成像
认知
模态(人机交互)
连贯性(哲学赌博策略)
认知心理学
计算机科学
人工智能
社会科学
物理
量子力学
社会学
作者
Uzair Hakim,Sara De Felice,Paola Pinti,X Zhang,J. Adam Noah,Yumie Ono,Paul W. Burgess,Antonia F. de C. Hamilton,Joy Hirsch,Ilias Tachtsidis
出处
期刊:NeuroImage
[Elsevier]
日期:2023-10-01
卷期号:280: 120354-120354
被引量:17
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120354
摘要
Hyperscanning is a form of neuroimaging experiment where the brains of two or more participants are imaged simultaneously whilst they interact. Within the domain of social neuroscience, hyperscanning is increasingly used to measure inter-brain coupling (IBC) and explore how brain responses change in tandem during social interaction. In addition to cognitive research, some have suggested that quantification of the interplay between interacting participants can be used as a biomarker for a variety of cognitive mechanisms aswell as to investigate mental health and developmental conditions including schizophrenia, social anxiety and autism. However, many different methods have been used to quantify brain coupling and this can lead to questions about comparability across studies and reduce research reproducibility. Here, we review methods for quantifying IBC, and suggest some ways moving forward. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed 215 hyperscanning studies, across four different brain imaging modalities: functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), functional magnetic resonance (fMRI), electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). Overall, the review identified a total of 27 different methods used to compute IBC. The most common hyperscanning modality is fNIRS, used by 119 studies, 89 of which adopted wavelet coherence. Based on the results of this literature survey, we first report summary statistics of the hyperscanning field, followed by a brief overview of each signal that is obtained from each neuroimaging modality used in hyperscanning. We then discuss the rationale, assumptions and suitability of each method to different modalities which can be used to investigate IBC. Finally, we discuss issues surrounding the interpretation of each method.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI