现象学(哲学)
括号(现象学)
自反性
认识论
数据收集
存在主义
现象
解释现象学分析
超越数
心理学
过程(计算)
社会学
计算机科学
定性研究
社会科学
操作系统
哲学
作者
Zenobia C.Y. Chan,Yuen-ling Fung,Wai Tong Chien
标识
DOI:10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1486
摘要
Our aim with this article is to demonstrate how the researchers use bracketing as a method of demonstrating the validity after initiating a phenomenological study. Although bracketing is a method of demonstrating the validity of the da ta collection and analysis process in most phenomenological studies, how the researchers use them in practice is rarely demonstrated explicitly. We collected data through our experiences in preparing a phenomenological research study. We suggest that the concept of bracketing should be adopted upon initiating the research proposal and not merely in the data collection and analysis process. We propose four strategies for doing bracketing that are guided by the thinking activity of reflexivity: mentality assessment and preparation before deciding the research paradigm, deciding the scope of the literature review according to the prevailing gate - keeping policy, planning for data collection using semi - structured interviews guided by open - ended questions, and planning for data analysis using Colaizzi’s method. Our proposition highlights that thorough preparation for doing bracketing is essential before entering the data collection and analysis process in phenomenology, because they are sequentially related.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI