Switching the Antidepressant After Nonresponse in Adults With Major Depression: A Systematic Literature Search and Meta-Analysis.

萧条(经济学) 医学 重性抑郁障碍 临床心理学 心理信息 置信区间
作者
Tom Bschor,Hannah Kern,Jonathan Henssler,Christopher Baethge
出处
期刊:The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry [Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.]
卷期号:79 (1) 被引量:47
标识
DOI:10.4088/jcp.16r10749
摘要

Objective Nonresponders to antidepressant monotherapy during acute treatment of major depression are often switched to a new antidepressant. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of switching to a new antidepressant with continuation of the first antidepressant. Data sources PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases and additional sources were systematically searched independently by 2 authors up to March 2015 without language limitations. With employment of a sensitivity-enhancing search strategy, generic terms for major depression, switching, and randomized trials were combined. Study selection Articles (3,234) were screened for trials of patients with major depression who had not responded to antidepressant monotherapy who were then randomized either to a new antidepressant or to continuation of the first antidepressant. Studies were subdivided into those not allowing for dose escalation in the continuation arm (strict analysis) and those allowing for dose escalation (broad analysis). Data extraction Data were extracted and risk of bias was assessed independently by 2 authors, and data were pooled using random effects models. Results Four randomized controlled trials were included in the strict analysis and 8 in the broad analysis. In both analyses, switching was not superior to continuation: the standardized mean difference in the strict analysis was -0.17 (95% CI, -0.59 to 0.26; P = .45; I² = 77.8%) and in the broad analysis was 0.031 (95% CI, -0.26 to 0.32; P = .836; I² = 85.3%). All secondary outcome analyses (response and remission rates, low risk of bias studies only, leave-one-out analysis, dropouts) supported the results. There was no indication of publication bias. Conclusions There is a dearth of randomized controlled trials investigating switching. There is no high-level evidence that switching the antidepressant is effective when compared to simply continuing the initial antidepressant. Since there are better treatment options than switching, physicians should be cautious to switch antidepressants.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
咔叽麻发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
3秒前
lilala完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
高源高源发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
充电宝应助加冰采纳,获得10
7秒前
10秒前
美文完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
14秒前
15秒前
小白完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
白雪阁完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
18秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
shinysparrow应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
liv应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
梦亦非发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
育种小杰发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
卡卡完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
谢会会发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
育种小杰完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
彭于晏应助TOF采纳,获得10
33秒前
33秒前
36秒前
赘婿应助傢誠采纳,获得10
37秒前
37秒前
38秒前
破晓应助谢会会采纳,获得10
40秒前
小玲仔发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
43秒前
45秒前
TOF发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
无心的秋珊完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
49秒前
万能图书馆应助闵卷采纳,获得10
51秒前
ambition完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
DIDIDI完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
甜美笑柳完成签到,获得积分10
54秒前
科研菜鸟完成签到,获得积分10
55秒前
可可发布了新的文献求助10
57秒前
高分求助中
The three stars each : the Astrolabes and related texts 1070
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4 Volume Set (ASM Books) 13th Edition 1000
Sport in der Antike 800
Aspect and Predication: The Semantics of Argument Structure 666
De arte gymnastica. The art of gymnastics 600
少脉山油柑叶的化学成分研究 530
Sport in der Antike Hardcover – March 1, 2015 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2408821
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2104915
关于积分的说明 5315359
捐赠科研通 1832423
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 913063
版权声明 560733
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 488238