医学
协议(科学)
定性研究
医学教育
系统回顾
临床实习
护理部
替代医学
梅德林
家庭医学
病理
政治学
社会科学
社会学
法学
作者
Ravi Shankar,Fiona Devi,Emily Ang,Joyce Er
出处
期刊:BMJ Open
[BMJ]
日期:2025-08-01
卷期号:15 (8): e099875-e099875
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099875
摘要
Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly being developed and deployed to support clinical decision-making, care delivery and patient monitoring in healthcare. However, the adoption of AI-driven solutions by nurses, who comprise the largest segment of the healthcare workforce and are central to patient care, has been limited to date. Understanding nurses’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to AI adoption is critical for successful integration of AI in nursing practice. This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesise qualitative evidence on nurses’ perceived barriers and facilitators to adopting AI-driven solutions in their clinical practice. Methods and analysis We will conduct systematic searches across eight electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Scopus) from inception to January 2025, supplemented by hand-searching reference lists and grey literature. Primary qualitative studies and qualitative components of mixed-methods studies exploring licensed/registered nurses’ perceptions of AI adoption in clinical settings will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data using standardised forms and assess methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. We will employ meta-ethnography to synthesise the qualitative evidence, involving systematic comparison and translation of concepts across studies to develop overarching themes and a theoretical framework. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach will be used to assess confidence in review findings. The protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines and the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement. Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required as this systematic review will synthesise data from published studies only. The findings will provide valuable insights to inform the development, implementation and evaluation of nurse-oriented strategies for AI integration in healthcare delivery. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and stakeholder engagement activities. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024602808.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI