亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Comparative analysis of large language models in medical counseling: A focus on Helicobacter pylori infection

幽门螺杆菌感染 幽门螺杆菌 利克特量表 完备性(序理论) 拉什模型 医学 英语 心理学 统计 内科学 数学 数学教育 数学分析
作者
Qingzhou Kong,Kunping Ju,Meng Wan,Jing Liu,Xiaoqi Wu,Yueyue Li,Xiuli Zuo,Yanqing Li
出处
期刊:Helicobacter [Wiley]
卷期号:29 (1) 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1111/hel.13055
摘要

Abstract Background Large language models (LLMs) are promising medical counseling tools, but the reliability of responses remains unclear. We aimed to assess the feasibility of three popular LLMs as counseling tools for Helicobacter pylori infection in different counseling languages. Materials and Methods This study was conducted between November 20 and December 1, 2023. Three large language models (ChatGPT 4.0 [LLM1], ChatGPT 3.5 [LLM2], and ERNIE Bot 4.0 [LLM3]) were input 15 H. pylori related questions each, once in English and once in Chinese. Each chat was conducted using the “New Chat” function to avoid bias from correlation interference. Responses were recorded and blindly assigned to three reviewers for scoring on three established Likert scales: accuracy (ranged 1–6 point), completeness (ranged 1–3 point), and comprehensibility (ranged 1–3 point). The acceptable thresholds for the scales were set at a minimum of 4, 2, and 2, respectively. Final various source and interlanguage comparisons were made. Results The overall mean (SD) accuracy score was 4.80 (1.02), while 1.82 (0.78) for completeness score and 2.90 (0.36) for comprehensibility score. The acceptable proportions for the accuracy, completeness, and comprehensibility of the responses were 90%, 45.6%, and 100%, respectively. The acceptable proportion of overall completeness score for English responses was better than for Chinese responses ( p = 0.034). For accuracy, the English responses of LLM3 were better than the Chinese responses ( p = 0.0055). As for completeness, the English responses of LLM1 was better than the Chinese responses ( p = 0.0257). For comprehensibility, the English responses of LLM1 was better than the Chinese responses ( p = 0.0496). No differences were found between the various LLMs. Conclusions The LLMs responded satisfactorily to questions related to H. pylori infection. But further improving completeness and reliability, along with considering language nuances, is crucial for optimizing overall performance.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Junex完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
18秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
满意梦露发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
28秒前
zpdkj发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
30秒前
58769完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
58769发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
40秒前
啊哈哈哈哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分20
40秒前
Crw__发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
Sym发布了新的文献求助20
41秒前
mingjie发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
慕青应助Jerry采纳,获得10
48秒前
机灵的念双完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
无花果应助南归采纳,获得10
49秒前
mingjie完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
机灵的念双关注了科研通微信公众号
53秒前
领导范儿应助啦啦啦采纳,获得10
55秒前
y2k发布了新的文献求助10
58秒前
小二郎应助58769采纳,获得10
59秒前
1分钟前
Prof.Z发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Jerry发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Akim应助逆夏采纳,获得10
1分钟前
连玉完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Lucas应助Jerry采纳,获得10
1分钟前
逆夏发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
南归发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Prof.Z发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
wuliumu完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
勤恳的念真完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
天天快乐应助seven采纳,获得10
1分钟前
zpdkj完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Overcoming Stigma and Bias in Obesity Management 800
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Bounds for Statistical Estimation in Semiparametric Models 500
Climate change and sports: Statistics report on climate change and sports 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 450
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6471857
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8275917
关于积分的说明 17646168
捐赠科研通 5550598
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2909374
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1886159
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1737026