Comparative analysis of large language models in medical counseling: A focus on Helicobacter pylori infection

幽门螺杆菌感染 幽门螺杆菌 利克特量表 完备性(序理论) 拉什模型 医学 英语 心理学 统计 内科学 数学 数学教育 数学分析
作者
Qingzhou Kong,Kunping Ju,Meng Wan,Jing Liu,Xiaoqi Wu,Yueyue Li,Xiuli Zuo,Yanqing Li
出处
期刊:Helicobacter [Wiley]
卷期号:29 (1) 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1111/hel.13055
摘要

Abstract Background Large language models (LLMs) are promising medical counseling tools, but the reliability of responses remains unclear. We aimed to assess the feasibility of three popular LLMs as counseling tools for Helicobacter pylori infection in different counseling languages. Materials and Methods This study was conducted between November 20 and December 1, 2023. Three large language models (ChatGPT 4.0 [LLM1], ChatGPT 3.5 [LLM2], and ERNIE Bot 4.0 [LLM3]) were input 15 H. pylori related questions each, once in English and once in Chinese. Each chat was conducted using the “New Chat” function to avoid bias from correlation interference. Responses were recorded and blindly assigned to three reviewers for scoring on three established Likert scales: accuracy (ranged 1–6 point), completeness (ranged 1–3 point), and comprehensibility (ranged 1–3 point). The acceptable thresholds for the scales were set at a minimum of 4, 2, and 2, respectively. Final various source and interlanguage comparisons were made. Results The overall mean (SD) accuracy score was 4.80 (1.02), while 1.82 (0.78) for completeness score and 2.90 (0.36) for comprehensibility score. The acceptable proportions for the accuracy, completeness, and comprehensibility of the responses were 90%, 45.6%, and 100%, respectively. The acceptable proportion of overall completeness score for English responses was better than for Chinese responses ( p = 0.034). For accuracy, the English responses of LLM3 were better than the Chinese responses ( p = 0.0055). As for completeness, the English responses of LLM1 was better than the Chinese responses ( p = 0.0257). For comprehensibility, the English responses of LLM1 was better than the Chinese responses ( p = 0.0496). No differences were found between the various LLMs. Conclusions The LLMs responded satisfactorily to questions related to H. pylori infection. But further improving completeness and reliability, along with considering language nuances, is crucial for optimizing overall performance.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
娜娜完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
地老天框发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
顺心致远完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
白羽发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
LHH完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
大热热发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
搜集达人的应助被今天开心吗采纳,获得10
2秒前
程佳运发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
MMM发布了新的文献求助50
5秒前
yuzhouzhou完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
ste完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
曾芷怡完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
小马甲的应助被9924784采纳,获得10
8秒前
Orange的应助被Hommand_藏山采纳,获得10
8秒前
烟花的应助被lobster采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
泡芙小姐发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
12秒前
温柔可爱发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
ines完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
在水一方的应助被地老天框采纳,获得30
13秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被橘子采纳,获得10
13秒前
冻干粉发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
ROYXIONG完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
烟花的应助被程佳运采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
七星嘿咻发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
weng完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
仁爱的狗发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
淡定新竹完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被dnpl采纳,获得10
24秒前
25秒前
wanci的应助被欢呼的幻雪采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
li完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
CLSI C56QG Examples of Hemolyzed, Icteric, and Lipemic/Turbid Samples Quick Guide 400
Encyclopedia of Geology 2nd Edition 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7805083
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9338699
关于积分的说明 20492662
捐赠科研通 7397050
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3327659
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2474536
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2345780