漏斗图
出版偏见
统计
估计员
荟萃分析
差异(会计)
选择偏差
回归
考试(生物学)
计量经济学
回归分析
人口
元回归
数学
置信区间
人口学
医学
生物
经济
古生物学
会计
社会学
内科学
作者
Belén Fernández‐Castilla,Lies Declercq,Laleh Jamshidi,S. Natasha Beretvas,Patrick Onghena,Wim Van Den Noortgate
标识
DOI:10.1080/00220973.2019.1582470
摘要
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This study explores the performance of classical methods for detecting publication bias—namely, Egger’s regression test, Funnel Plot test, Begg’s Rank Correlation and Trim and Fill method—in meta-analysis of studies that report multiple effects. Publication bias, outcome reporting bias, and a combination of these were generated. Egger’s regression test and the Funnel Plot test were extended to three-level models, and possible cutoffs for the estimator of the Trim and Fill method were explored. Furthermore, we checked whether the combination of results of several methods yielded a better control of Type I error rates. Results show that no method works well across all conditions and that performance depends mainly on the population effect size value and the total variance.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI