医学
乳房再造术
置信区间
优势比
乳房切除术
外科
回顾性队列研究
患者满意度
乳房整形术
阶段(地层学)
生活质量(医疗保健)
乳腺癌
内科学
癌症
古生物学
护理部
生物
作者
Chia-Chun Lee,Cherng-Kang Perng,Hsu Ma,Szu-Hsien Wu,Fu‐Yin Hsiao,Ling‐Ming Tseng,Yi‐Fang Tsai,Yen‐Shu Lin,Pei‐Ju Lien,Chin-Jung Feng
标识
DOI:10.1097/sap.0000000000003114
摘要
The most widely used method for breast reconstruction in Taiwan is alloplastic breast reconstruction, and traditionally, it can be categorized into immediate or delayed, single-stage or 2-stage procedures. We evaluated clinical outcomes and analyzed patients' self-reported satisfaction and quality of life after alloplastic breast reconstruction based on a previous preliminary study.The patients who underwent primary alloplastic breast reconstruction after mastectomy were recruited in 2006 to 2020 at a single institute in Taiwan. The assessment of clinical outcomes was conducted by retrospective chart review and risk analysis. The patients also completed the BREAST-Q, a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure, at least 6 months after treatment.A total of 237 patients with 247 reconstructed breasts were enrolled in this study. The demographics showed that 205 (83%) were reconstructed using a 2-stage tissue expander-based procedure and 42 (17%) were 1-stage direct-to-implant reconstructions. The mean follow-up time was 79.5 months. The clinical assessment revealed that the overall complication rate was 34%, with infection being the most common (21 patients; 8%). According to risk analysis, smoking (odds ratio, 7.626; 95% confidence interval, 1.56-37.30; P = 0.012), and nipple-sparing mastectomy (odds ratio, 3.281; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-6.99; P = 0.002) were significant risk factors for overall complications. The questionnaire response rate was 38% (94 of 247), at least 6 months after treatment. The total mean score was 69.78.At a single institute in Taiwan from 2006 to 2020, alloplastic breast reconstruction, either single- or 2-stage, have acceptable complication rate and good postoperative satisfaction based on patient-reported outcomes. Both patient- and surgery-related factors presented as significant risk factors. Precise patient selection and comprehensive discussion between the patient and physician may play the important role to achieve optimal aesthetic outcomes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI