Yield of capsule endoscopy and subsequent device‐assisted enteroscopy: experience at an Australian tertiary centre

Abstract Background Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and device‐assisted enteroscopy (DAE) have an established role in the investigation and management of small bowel pathology. Previous studies have reported on the yield of SBCE (60%) and DAE (57%), but none have been in an Australian setting. Aims To determine the yield of SBCE and any DAE performed as a direct consequence of SBCE in an Australian referral centre. Methods A single‐centre retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Australia, enrolling consecutive patients between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2021 undergoing SBCE. Data were collected with respect to demographics, procedural factors and findings, as well as findings and interventions of any DAE procedures performed after the SBCE. Results 1214 SBCEs were performed, with a median age of 66 years old (60.8% men). The predominant indications were anaemia ( n = 853, 70.2%) and overt gastrointestinal bleeding ( n = 320, 26.4%). Of the complete small bowel studies (1132/1214, 93.2%), abnormal findings were detected in 588 cases (51.9%), most commonly angioectasias (266/588, 45.2%), erosions (106/588, 18.0%) and ulcers (97/588, 8.6%). 165 patients underwent a DAE (117 antegrade, 48 retrograde). Antegrade DAE had a higher yield than retrograde DAE (77.8% vs 54.2%; P = 0.002) and a higher rate of intervention (69.2% vs 37.5%; P < 0.001). Conclusion In this largest single‐centre cohort of patients undergoing SBCE to date, there is a similar yield of abnormal findings compared to existing literature. DAE, especially with an antegrade approach, had high diagnostic and therapeutic yield when pursued after a positive SBCE study.