白质疏松症
临床痴呆评级
痴呆
血管性痴呆
高强度
白质
心理学
齿轮
评定量表
认知
内科学
医学
发展心理学
精神科
疾病
磁共振成像
人工智能
计算机科学
放射科
作者
Raija Ylikoski,Hanna Jokinen,Pia Haubro Andersen,Oili Salonen,Sofia Madureira,José M. Ferro,Frederik Barkhof,Wiesje M. van der Flier,Reinhold Schmidt,Franz Fazekas,Philip Scheltens,Gunhild Waldemar,Emilia Salvadori,Leonardo Pantoni,Domenico Inzitari,Timo Erkinjuntti
摘要
<i>Background/Aims:</i> The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) is a widely used rating instrument. The Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (VADAS-cog) includes additional tests reflecting mental speed and executive functions. The objective of this study was to compare the results of the two scales among subjects with various degrees of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). <i>Methods:</i>In the multicentre, multinational Leukoaraiosis and Disability in the Elderly (LADIS) study, 616 non-disabled subjects between the ages of 65 and 84 were examined using MRI, the ADAS-cog and VADAS-cog. The WMH rating from the MRI divided the patients into groups of mild (n = 280), moderate (n = 187) and severe (n = 149) degrees of change. <i>Results:</i> Covariance analysis controlling for the effect of age and education revealed that the ADAS-cog differentiated only the mild and severe WMH groups, while the differences between all three groups were highly significant with the VADAS-cog. <i>Conclusions:</i>The VADAS-cog significantly differentiated between all the white matter groups. In comparison, the ADAS-cog differentiated only severe changes. Accordingly, the VADAS-cog may be a more sensitive endpoint in studies of patients with white matter load and vascular burden of the brain.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI