变向性
医学
左旋西孟旦
多巴酚丁胺
心源性休克
米力农
安慰剂
重症监护医学
休克(循环)
重症医师
去甲肾上腺素
感染性休克
麻醉
心脏病学
重症监护室
内科学
血流动力学
败血症
心肌梗塞
多巴胺
替代医学
病理
作者
Kira Hu,Rebecca Mathew
标识
DOI:10.1097/mcc.0000000000000957
摘要
Purpose of review Despite increasing interest in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS), mortality rates remain unacceptably high. The mainstay of supportive treatment includes vasopressors and inotropes. These medications are recommended in international guidelines and are widely used despite limited evidence supporting safety and efficacy in CS. Recent findings The OptimaCC trial further supports that norepinephrine should continue to be the first-line vasopressor of choice in CS. The CAPITAL DOREMI trial found that milrinone is not superior to dobutamine in reducing morbidity and mortality in CS. Two studies currently underway will offer the first evidence of the necessity of inotrope therapy in placebo-controlled trials: CAPITAL DOREMI2 will randomize CS patients to inotrope or placebo in the initial resuscitation of shock to evaluate the efficacy of inotrope therapy and LevoHeartShock will examine the efficacy of levosimendan against placebo in early CS requiring vasopressor therapy. Summary Review of the current literature fails to show significant mortality benefit with any specific vasopressor or inotropic in CS patients. The upcoming DOREMI 2 and levosimendan versus placebo trials will further tackle the question of inotrope necessity in CS. At this time, inotrope selection should be guided by physician experience, availability, cost, and most importantly, individual patients’ response to therapy.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI