Prevalence of frailty and reliability of established frailty instruments in adult elective colorectal surgical patients: a prospective cohort study

医学 前瞻性队列研究 人口 队列 虚弱指数 队列研究 内科学 老年学 物理疗法 环境卫生
作者
Thomas Dale MacLaine,O. E. Baker,Dermot Burke,Simon Howell
出处
期刊:Postgraduate Medical Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:98 (1160): 456-460 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139417
摘要

Large population studies now demonstrate that frailty is prevalent in all adult age groups. Limited data exist on the association between frailty and surgical outcome in younger patients. The aim of the study was to explore the agreement between frailty identification tools and collect pilot data on their predictive value for frailty-associated outcomes in an adult surgical population.Prospective cohort study.Frailty scores were recorded in 200 patients (91 men), mean (range) age 57 (18-92) years. The prevalence of prefrailty was 52%-67% and that of frailty 2%-32% depending on the instrument used. Agreement between the instruments was poor, kappa 0.08-0.17 in pairwise comparisons. Outcome data were available on 160 patients. Only the frailty phenotype was significantly associated with adverse outcomes, RR 6.1 (1.5-24.5) for postoperative complications. The three frailty scoring instruments studies had good sensitivity (Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)-90%, Accumulation Deficit (AD)-96%, Frailty Phenotype (FP)-97%) but poor specificity (CFS-12%, AD-13%, FP-18%) for the prediction of postoperative complications. All three instruments were poorly predictive of adverse outcomes with likelihood ratios of CFS-1.02, AD-1.09 and FP-1.17.This study showed a significant prevalence of prefrailty and frailty in adult colorectal surgical patients of all ages. There was poor agreement between three established frailty scoring instruments. Our data do not support the use of current frailty scoring instruments in all adult colorectal surgical patients. However, the significant prevalence of prefrailty and frailty across all age groups of adult surgical patient justifies further research to refine frailty scoring in surgical patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
DW应助李大刚采纳,获得10
1秒前
顾九完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
zhangsf关注了科研通微信公众号
1秒前
小徐辛苦搬砖完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
orixero应助Jbiolover采纳,获得10
2秒前
一自文又欠完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
精明诗霜完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
科研小贩完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
sprit发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
落后的幻翠完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
牙膏完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
小蛤蟆完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
yy发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Ava应助人福药业采纳,获得10
4秒前
芝华完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
坚持三年完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
背后的山晴完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
XHH1994发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
lulu发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
jifas发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
xiexie发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
希妍完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
认真的裤子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
yangqiaozhe发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
JamesPei应助Communist采纳,获得10
6秒前
阿斯顿法国红酒看完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
轻松大王完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
充电宝应助wuke采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
怕孤单完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
陈仙仙完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.4应助项申奥采纳,获得10
7秒前
zl完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders: Interdisciplinary Perspectives 750
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7733223
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9283978
关于积分的说明 20162036
捐赠科研通 7311162
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3304284
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2457078
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2313527