Clinical guidelines versus current clinical practice for the management of deep vein thrombosis

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is one of the major health problems worldwide with potentially serious outcomes related to mortality and morbidity. We provide a current view on how patients with DVT are managed in routine practice compared with the recommendations of published clinical guidelines.A literature review was conducted on studies reporting diagnostic and treatment patterns for acute DVT. Four dimensions were evaluated to compare the differences between clinical practice and clinical guidelines recommendations: diagnostic pathway, prescription of pharmacologic treatment and related duration, and prescription of compression therapy. For each aspect, the agreement with the corresponding guideline has been estimated as a percentage ranging from 0% (no agreement) to 100% (full agreement).Sixteen studies reported clinical practices in 10 countries. Among them, Japan showed the highest agreement with guidelines, followed by the UK and Switzerland. Hong Kong showed the highest agreement with diagnosis guidelines, Spain for drug treatment, UK for treatment duration, and France for compression therapy. Conversely, Germany reported a complete disagreement with guidelines for diagnosis, followed by low agreement level by UK and Italy, and Switzerland reported a lower agreement level with prescription of compression therapy.The implementation of clinical guidelines for the management of patients with DVT varies among countries from strict adherence to a complete lack of adherence. In this context, registries may be a useful tool to analyze clinical practice and produce findings that may be generalizable across populations.