远程康复
医学
脊髓损伤
物理医学与康复
脊髓
远程医疗
医疗保健
经济增长
经济
精神科
作者
Alejandro García‐Rudolph,Mark Andrew Wright,Carlos Jaime Yepes,Narda Murillo,Lucas Conesa,Ignasi Soriano,Raquel Bautista,Eloy Opisso,Josep M. Tormos,Josep R. Medina
出处
期刊:Pm&r
[Wiley]
日期:2023-12-29
卷期号:16 (8): 815-825
被引量:2
摘要
Abstract Background Telerehabilitation in spinal cord injury (teleSCI) is a growing field that can improve access to care and health outcomes in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The clinical effectiveness of teleSCI is not known. Objectives To compare independence in activities of daily living and mobility capacity in patients following teleSCI and matched controls undergoing traditional rehabilitation. Design Matched case–control study. Setting TeleSCI occurring in home setting (cases) versus traditional rehabilitation on inpatient unit (controls). Participants Forty‐two consecutive patients with SCI followed with teleSCI were compared to 42 historical rehabilitation inpatients (controls) matched for age, time since injury to rehabilitation admission, level of injury (paraplegia/tetraplegia), complete or incomplete injury, and etiology (traumatic/nontraumatic). The teleSCI group ( n = 42) was also compared to the complete cohort of historical controls ( n = 613). Interventions The teleSCI group followed home‐based telerehabilitation (3.5 h/day, 5 days/week, 67 days average duration) and historical controls followed in‐person rehabilitation. Main Outcome Measure(s) The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI). We formally compared gains, efficiency and effectiveness. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury and the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) were used. Results The teleSCI group (57.1% nontraumatic, 71.4% paraplegia, 73.8% incomplete, 52.4% AIS grade D) showed no significant differences compared with historical controls in AIS grades, neurological levels, duration, gains, efficiency and effectiveness in FIM, SCIM, or WISCI, although the teleSCI cohort had significantly higher admission FIM scores compared with the complete cohort of historical controls. Conclusions TeleSCI may provide similar improvements in mobility and functional outcomes as traditional rehabilitation in medically stable patients (predominantly with paraplegia and motor incomplete SCI) when provided with appropriate support and equipment.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI