Oral semaglutide versus subcutaneous liraglutide and placebo in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 4): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3a trial

赛马鲁肽 利拉鲁肽 医学 安慰剂 临床终点 内科学 2型糖尿病 艾塞那肽 糖尿病 药理学 杜拉鲁肽 胃肠病学 随机对照试验 内分泌学 病理 替代医学
作者
Richard E. Pratley,Aslam Amod,Søren T. Hoff,Takashi Kadowaki,Ildiko Lingvay,Michael A. Nauck,Karen Boje Pedersen,Trine Saugstrup,Pioneer investigators
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier]
卷期号:394 (10192): 39-50 被引量:309
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31271-1
摘要

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are effective treatments for type 2 diabetes, lowering glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight, but are currently only approved for use as subcutaneous injections. Oral semaglutide, a novel GLP-1 agonist, was compared with subcutaneous liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes.In this randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3a trial, we recruited patients with type 2 diabetes from 100 sites in 12 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with HbA1c of 7·0-9·5% (53-80·3 mmol/mol), on a stable dose of metformin (≥1500 mg or maximum tolerated) with or without a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor. Participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) with an interactive web-response system and stratified by background glucose-lowering medication and country of origin, to once-daily oral semaglutide (dose escalated to 14 mg), once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (dose escalated to 1·8 mg), or placebo for 52 weeks. Two estimands were defined: treatment policy (regardless of study drug discontinuation or rescue medication) and trial product (assumed all participants were on study drug without rescue medication) in all participants who were randomly assigned. The treatment policy estimand was the primary estimand. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 26 in HbA1c (oral semaglutide superiority vs placebo and non-inferiority [margin: 0·4%] and superiority vs subcutaneous liraglutide) and the confirmatory secondary endpoint was change from baseline to week 26 in bodyweight (oral semaglutide superiority vs placebo and liraglutide). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT02863419, and the European Clinical Trials registry, number EudraCT 2015-005210-30.Between Aug 10, 2016, and Feb 7, 2017, 950 patients were screened, of whom 711 were eligible and randomly assigned to oral semaglutide (n=285), subcutaneous liraglutide (n=284), or placebo (n=142). 341 (48%) of 711 participants were female and the mean age was 56 years (SD 10). All participants were given at least one dose of study drug, and 277 (97%) participants in the oral semaglutide group, 274 (96%) in the liraglutide group, and 134 (94%) in the placebo group completed the 52-week trial period. Mean change from baseline in HbA1c at week 26 was -1·2% (SE 0·1) with oral semaglutide, -1·1% (SE 0·1) with subcutaneous liraglutide, and -0·2% (SE 0·1) with placebo. Oral semaglutide was non-inferior to subcutaneous liraglutide in decreasing HbA1c (estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0·1%, 95% CI -0·3 to 0·0; p<0·0001) and superior to placebo (ETD -1·1%, -1·2 to -0·9; p<0·0001) by use of the treatment policy estimand. By use of the trial product estimand, oral semaglutide had significantly greater decreases in HbA1c than both subcutaneous liraglutide (ETD -0·2%, 95% CI -0·3 to -0·1; p=0·0056) and placebo (ETD -1·2%, -1·4 to -1·0; p<0·0001) at week 26. Oral semaglutide resulted in superior weight loss (-4·4 kg [SE 0·2]) compared with liraglutide (-3·1 kg [SE 0·2]; ETD -1·2 kg, 95% CI -1·9 to -0·6; p=0·0003) and placebo (-0·5 kg [SE 0·3]; ETD -3·8 kg, -4·7 to -3·0; p<0·0001) at week 26 (treatment policy). By use of the trial product estimand, weight loss at week 26 was significantly greater with oral semaglutide than with subcutaneous liraglutide (-1·5 kg, 95% CI -2·2 to -0·9; p<0·0001) and placebo (ETD -4·0 kg, -4·8 to -3·2; p<0·0001). Adverse events were more frequent with oral semaglutide (n=229 [80%]) and subcutaneous liraglutide (n=211 [74%]) than with placebo (n=95 [67%]).Oral semaglutide was non-inferior to subcutaneous liraglutide and superior to placebo in decreasing HbA1c, and superior in decreasing bodyweight compared with both liraglutide and placebo at week 26. Safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide were similar to subcutaneous liraglutide. Use of oral semaglutide could potentially lead to earlier initiation of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in the diabetes treatment continuum of care.Novo Nordisk A/S.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
风卷云舒完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
3秒前
完美世界应助Aggy采纳,获得10
5秒前
7秒前
我是老大应助fujibear采纳,获得10
8秒前
onexx完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
cctv18应助YNGU采纳,获得30
9秒前
真理完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
北风完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
MP应助小野马采纳,获得20
14秒前
个性的紫菜应助邢彬采纳,获得10
14秒前
失眠的诗蕊完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
14秒前
斯文败类应助小周很酷采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
大个应助心灵美的幻露采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
涛涛发布了新的文献求助30
18秒前
accept完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
绵绵发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Jeson完成签到,获得积分0
19秒前
21秒前
langxueqing完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
cctv18应助白衣采纳,获得10
22秒前
lucorta完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
上官若男应助accept采纳,获得10
25秒前
CodeCraft应助优美柏柳采纳,获得10
26秒前
埮埮完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
Meng完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
26秒前
行星完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
行星发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
白衣发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
34秒前
珍妮玛黛劲完成签到 ,获得积分0
36秒前
NexusExplorer应助juncguo采纳,获得10
37秒前
37秒前
37秒前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Particle strengthening of metals and alloys 500
Monocentric experience of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and foraminotomy outcomes: pushing the indications and avoiding failure. Report of 200 cases 400
Transferrin affects food intake and reproduction in the hard tick Haemaphysalis longicornis 400
Lexique et typologie des poteries: pour la normalisation de la description des poteries (Full Book) 400
Sustainable Land Management: Strategies to Cope with the Marginalisation of Agriculture 400
Transformerboard III 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2354444
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2060781
关于积分的说明 5140252
捐赠科研通 1790917
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 894656
版权声明 557235
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 477378