Oral semaglutide versus subcutaneous liraglutide and placebo in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 4): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3a trial

赛马鲁肽 利拉鲁肽 医学 安慰剂 内科学 双盲 2型糖尿病 糖尿病 内分泌学 病理 替代医学
作者
Richard E. Pratley,Aslam Amod,Søren T. Hoff,Takashi Kadowaki,Ildiko Lingvay,Michael A. Nauck,Karen Boje Pedersen,Trine Saugstrup,Juris J. Meier
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:394 (10192): 39-50 被引量:537
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31271-1
摘要

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are effective treatments for type 2 diabetes, lowering glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight, but are currently only approved for use as subcutaneous injections. Oral semaglutide, a novel GLP-1 agonist, was compared with subcutaneous liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes.In this randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3a trial, we recruited patients with type 2 diabetes from 100 sites in 12 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with HbA1c of 7·0-9·5% (53-80·3 mmol/mol), on a stable dose of metformin (≥1500 mg or maximum tolerated) with or without a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor. Participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) with an interactive web-response system and stratified by background glucose-lowering medication and country of origin, to once-daily oral semaglutide (dose escalated to 14 mg), once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (dose escalated to 1·8 mg), or placebo for 52 weeks. Two estimands were defined: treatment policy (regardless of study drug discontinuation or rescue medication) and trial product (assumed all participants were on study drug without rescue medication) in all participants who were randomly assigned. The treatment policy estimand was the primary estimand. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 26 in HbA1c (oral semaglutide superiority vs placebo and non-inferiority [margin: 0·4%] and superiority vs subcutaneous liraglutide) and the confirmatory secondary endpoint was change from baseline to week 26 in bodyweight (oral semaglutide superiority vs placebo and liraglutide). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT02863419, and the European Clinical Trials registry, number EudraCT 2015-005210-30.Between Aug 10, 2016, and Feb 7, 2017, 950 patients were screened, of whom 711 were eligible and randomly assigned to oral semaglutide (n=285), subcutaneous liraglutide (n=284), or placebo (n=142). 341 (48%) of 711 participants were female and the mean age was 56 years (SD 10). All participants were given at least one dose of study drug, and 277 (97%) participants in the oral semaglutide group, 274 (96%) in the liraglutide group, and 134 (94%) in the placebo group completed the 52-week trial period. Mean change from baseline in HbA1c at week 26 was -1·2% (SE 0·1) with oral semaglutide, -1·1% (SE 0·1) with subcutaneous liraglutide, and -0·2% (SE 0·1) with placebo. Oral semaglutide was non-inferior to subcutaneous liraglutide in decreasing HbA1c (estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0·1%, 95% CI -0·3 to 0·0; p<0·0001) and superior to placebo (ETD -1·1%, -1·2 to -0·9; p<0·0001) by use of the treatment policy estimand. By use of the trial product estimand, oral semaglutide had significantly greater decreases in HbA1c than both subcutaneous liraglutide (ETD -0·2%, 95% CI -0·3 to -0·1; p=0·0056) and placebo (ETD -1·2%, -1·4 to -1·0; p<0·0001) at week 26. Oral semaglutide resulted in superior weight loss (-4·4 kg [SE 0·2]) compared with liraglutide (-3·1 kg [SE 0·2]; ETD -1·2 kg, 95% CI -1·9 to -0·6; p=0·0003) and placebo (-0·5 kg [SE 0·3]; ETD -3·8 kg, -4·7 to -3·0; p<0·0001) at week 26 (treatment policy). By use of the trial product estimand, weight loss at week 26 was significantly greater with oral semaglutide than with subcutaneous liraglutide (-1·5 kg, 95% CI -2·2 to -0·9; p<0·0001) and placebo (ETD -4·0 kg, -4·8 to -3·2; p<0·0001). Adverse events were more frequent with oral semaglutide (n=229 [80%]) and subcutaneous liraglutide (n=211 [74%]) than with placebo (n=95 [67%]).Oral semaglutide was non-inferior to subcutaneous liraglutide and superior to placebo in decreasing HbA1c, and superior in decreasing bodyweight compared with both liraglutide and placebo at week 26. Safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide were similar to subcutaneous liraglutide. Use of oral semaglutide could potentially lead to earlier initiation of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in the diabetes treatment continuum of care.Novo Nordisk A/S.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.2应助疯子采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
高挑的未来完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
李文亚完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
情怀应助kaw采纳,获得10
1秒前
Leslie发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
万能图书馆应助小呆采纳,获得10
2秒前
行走的荷尔蒙应助33采纳,获得30
2秒前
情怀应助皮崇知采纳,获得10
2秒前
qq发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Orange应助科研大师兄采纳,获得10
2秒前
fungii完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Orange应助深巷南离木采纳,获得10
3秒前
大意的觅云完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
崔玉坤完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
时尚寄真发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
君羊发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
JamesPei应助Luosir采纳,获得10
6秒前
悦耳白山应助DND采纳,获得10
6秒前
fungii发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
朗道二级相变完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
香蕉觅云应助ale采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
暮烟完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
下载文献啊完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
范森林完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
现代的秋发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
小猫完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
chi完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
会撒娇的芷烟完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
zzz完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
48V Low-voltage Power Distribution Network (PDN) Architecture Industry Report, 2024 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
适配Micro-LED色转换的高兼容性量子点负性光刻胶制备与工艺研究 500
Direct and Iterative Linear System Solvers 500
Vander's Renal Physiology第10版 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7307434
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8925144
关于积分的说明 18911947
捐赠科研通 6970077
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3212567
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2381157
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2190208