接受者
氢键
结晶学
分子
化学
Crystal(编程语言)
人口
粘结长度
分子几何学
晶体结构
立体化学
物理
凝聚态物理
人口学
有机化学
社会学
计算机科学
程序设计语言
作者
Binoy K. Saha,Arijit Saha,Durgam Sharada,Sumair A. Rather
标识
DOI:10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01164
摘要
Three sets of statistical analyses have been performed to evaluate whether C–F or C═O is the better C–H hydrogen bond acceptor and to understand the nature and preferred geometry of the C–H···F–C interactions. The first analysis uses Hirshfeld surface of the molecules, which shows that C═O is a better hydrogen bond acceptor than C–F, though C–H···F–C interactions also play an important role in crystal packing. The second analysis compares the population densities of C–H···F–C interactions at different H···F distances and at different C–H···F or C–F···H angles. This analysis shows the directional nature of this interaction. The third analysis shows which combinations of the C–H···F and C–F···H angles are preferred by the C–H···F–C interactions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI