狼牙棒
医学
再狭窄
心肌梗塞
临床终点
靶病变
药物洗脱支架
依维莫司
随机对照试验
气球
导管
放射科
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
内科学
支架
外科
临床试验
紫杉醇
前瞻性队列研究
心脏病学
化疗
作者
José Ramón López Mínguez,Juan Manuel Nogales Asensio,Luis Javier Doncel Vecino,Jorge Sandoval,Sebastián Romany,Pedro Martínez Romero,Jose Antonio Fernandez Diaz,Javier Fernández Portales,Reyes González Fernández,Ginés Martínez Cáceres,Antonio Merchán Herrera,Fernando Alfonso Manterola
出处
期刊:Eurointervention
[European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions]
日期:2014-05-01
卷期号:10 (1): 50-57
被引量:72
摘要
Paclitaxel drug-eluting balloons (pDEB) could be an attractive option to minimise side branch (SB) restenosis in bifurcated coronary lesions. We compared angiographic and clinical outcomes with pDEB plus bare metal stent (BMS) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) in de novo bifurcated lesions.This multicentre randomised trial included 108 patients. Sequential main branch (MB)/SB dilatation with pDEB, with provisional T-stenting with BMS in the MB was performed in the pDEB group, and with everolimus DES in the DES group. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss (LLL) at nine months. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularisation). In-segment MB LLL was 0.31±0.48 mm in the pDEB group, and 0.16±0.38 mm in the DES group (p=0.15); mean difference was 0.15 mm (upper limit one-sided 95% CI: 0.27 mm; p=0.001; non-inferiority test). LLL in SB was -0.04±0.76 mm in the pDEB group and -0.03±0.51 mm in the DES group (p=0.983). MACE and TLR were higher in the pDEB group (17.3% vs. 7.1%; p=0.105, and 15.4% vs. 3.6%; p=0.045), due to higher MB restenosis (13.5% vs. 1.8%; p=0.027).pDEB bifurcation pretreatment with BMS implantation in MB showed greater LLL (ns) and increased incidence of MACE compared to everolimus DES. Both strategies showed similar results in the SB.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI