Differences in Photophysical Properties and Photochemistry of Ru(II)–Terpyridine Complexes of CH3CN and Pyridine

A series of 22 Ru(II) complexes of the type [Ru(tpy)(L)(L')]n+, where tpy is the tridentate ligand 2,2';6,2″-terpyridine, L represents bidentate ligands with varying electron-donating ability, and L' is acetonitrile (1a-11a) or pyridine (1b-11b), were investigated. The dissociation of acetonitrile occurs from the 3MLCT state in 1a-11a, such that it does not require the population of a 3LF state. Electrochemistry and spectroscopic data demonstrate that the ground states of these series do not differ significantly. Franck-Condon line-shape analysis of the 77 K emission data shows no significant differences between the emitting 3MLCT states in both series. Arrhenius analysis of the temperature dependence of 3MLCT lifetimes shows that the energy barrier (Ea) to thermally populating a 3LF state from a lower energy 3MLCT state is significantly higher in the pyridine than in the CH3CN series, consistent with the photostability of complexes 1b-11b, which do not undergo pyridine photodissociation under our experimental conditions. Importantly, these results demonstrate that ligand photodissociation of pyridine in 1b-11b does not take place directly from the 3MLCT state, as is the case for 1a-11a. These findings have potential impact on the rational design of complexes for a number of applications, including photochemotherapy, dye-sensitized solar cells, and photocatalysis.