心理干预
优势和劣势
系统回顾
危害
荟萃分析
医学
梅德林
心理学
护理部
社会心理学
病理
政治学
法学
作者
Jonathan A C Sterne,Miguel A. Hernán,Barnaby C Reeves,Jelena Savović,Nancy D Berkman,Meera Viswanathan,David Henry,Douglas G. Altman,Mohammed Ansari,Isabelle Boutron,James R. Carpenter,An‐Wen Chan,Rachel Churchill,Jonathan J Deeks,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Jamie J Kirkham,Peter Jüni,Yoon K. Loke,Theresa D Pigott,Craig Ramsay
摘要
Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I ("Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions"), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI