阿米必利
随机对照试验
鲁拉西酮
利培酮
奥氮平
齐拉西酮
语言学习
奎硫平
言语记忆
心理学
精神科
认知
精神分裂症(面向对象编程)
工作记忆
口语流利性测试
舍廷多尔
临床心理学
医学
抗精神病药
神经心理学
内科学
作者
Daniel Prates Baldez,Tais Boeira Biazus,Francisco Diego Rabelo-da-Ponte,Guilherme Pedro Nogaro,Dayane Santos Martins,Maurício Kunz,Letícia Sanguinetti Czepielewski
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.028
摘要
Cognitive deficits are a core aspect of psychotic disorders; however, it is not clear to which extent different pharmacological treatments could distinctly impact these outcomes. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and ten network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials to compare the effect of antipsychotics on cognitive performance of individuals with psychotic disorders. Fifty-four trials were included in the analyses, enrolling 5866 patients. Compared to other antipsychotics, amisulpride performed better on verbal learning; quetiapine on composite score, attention and verbal learning; lurasidone on composite score; olanzapine on composite score and most cognitive domains; perphenazine on composite score, executive function, working memory, and verbal learning; risperidone on executive function and verbal learning; sertindole on processing speed; and ziprasidone on composite score, working memory, and verbal learning. Oppositely, haloperidol performed poorer on all cognitive domains, occupying the last positions in all rankings; and clozapine performed poorer on composite score, executive function, verbal learning, and visuoconstruction. We hope that these results should be taken into account when assessing and treating individuals with psychosis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI