医学
倾向得分匹配
队列
栓塞
回顾性队列研究
支架
动脉瘤
外科
地图集(解剖学)
并发症
放射科
内科学
解剖
作者
Guo‐Feng Zhang,Yunan Shen,Zhao Linbo,Heng Ni,Zhenyu Jia,Yuezhou Cao,Guangdong Lu,Xinglong Liu,Bin Wang,Chun Zhou,Shi Haibin,Sheng Liu
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123747
摘要
To compare the embolization outcomes and complications of the LEO Baby and Neuroform Atlas stents in the endovascular treatment of intracranial wide-neck aneurysms. We identified patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with LEO Baby (n=163) or Atlas (n=65) stent-assisted coiling between October 2018 and February 2023. A retrospective analysis of demographics, aneurysm characteristics, embolization outcomes, and procedure-related complications was performed. Propensity score matching analysis with a ratio of 1:2 was used to balance the patient selection bias that existed between the two cohorts. Compared to the Atlas cohort, the LEO Baby cohort had a higher rate of immediate successful embolization (95.6% vs. 78.5%, P<0.001) and a lower rate of incomplete embolization at midterm follow-up (4.0% vs. 18.6%, P=0.006), but there was no significant difference for either after matching for a 1:2 propensity score (P=0.091 and P=0.081, respectively). Procedure-related complications were 10.4% (17/163) in the LEO Baby cohort and 7.7% (5/65) in the Atlas cohort. At midterm angiographic follow-up, recanalization occurred in 0.8% (1/124) of the LEO Baby cohort and 4.7% (2/43) of the Atlas cohort. Complication and recanalization rates for both stents were not statistically different before (P=0.701 and P=0.332, respectively) and after (P>0.999 and P>0.999, respectively) propensity score matching. Both LEO Baby and Atlas are safe and effective in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, and they are similar in terms of aneurysm embolization outcomes and complication rates.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI