主体化
情态动词
道义逻辑
意义(存在)
语言学
语法化
语义变化
认识论
情态动词
心理学
社会学
哲学
动词
化学
高分子化学
作者
Pieter Byloo,Jan Nuyts
标识
DOI:10.1080/03740463.2014.955978
摘要
This article presents a corpus-based analysis of the semantic developments of the three most “prototypical” Dutch modals, kunnen ‘can’, mogen ‘may’, and moeten ‘must’. It focuses on the implications for current concepts of (inter)subjectification. The three modals turn out not to behave in a uniform way and to show different diachronic profiles: kunnen and mogen do but moeten does not show clear processes of (inter)subjectification, while kunnen is a much “younger” modal than mogen and moeten. In terms of paths of semantic change, the investigation shows that evolutions toward more (inter)subjective meanings are often not linear. Even if they predominantly emerge from one other meaning, new meanings can have secondary sources. Furthermore, evolutions often happen in parallel, with one specific meaning serving as the source for several others (e.g., deontic, epistemic/evidential, and directive meanings typically all evolve in parallel from a dynamic modal meaning).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI