健康素养
心理干预
医疗保健
读写能力
检查表
定性研究
内容分析
护理部
医学
心理学
医学教育
社会学
教育学
经济增长
经济
认知心理学
社会科学
作者
Chen Chen,Jing Zheng,Xu Liu,Jiali Liu,Yan Xie,S. Y. Shi,Liming You
摘要
ABSTRACT Aims To describe the perspectives of individuals receiving haemodialysis regarding health literacy in fluid management. Design A qualitative descriptive approach using directed content analysis of interviews from an explanatory mixed methods study. Methods Semi‐structured individual interviews were conducted from September 2020 to February 2021 with 28 individuals receiving haemodialysis who had attended a prior quantitative study. A directed qualitative content analysis approach was used to identify categories and subcategories emerging from the data. Results Six categories of health literacy were identified: (1) active health management, (2) engagement with healthcare providers, (3) understanding and support from healthcare providers, (4) social support, (5) health information literacy and (6) navigation of the healthcare system. Conclusions Based on their real‐life experience, individuals receiving haemodialysis have unique health literacy needs regarding fluid management. A comprehensive understanding of these unique needs is crucial in creating person‐centered interventions to address inadequate fluid restriction. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care Interventions to address inadequate fluid restriction should be person‐centered, considering each individual's unique health literacy needs. This involves conducting a comprehensive assessment of individuals' health literacy needs, empowering individuals to actively engage in health, engaging the entire support network and facilitating health information literacy in line with individuals' preferences. Impact This study offers detailed insights into the health literacy needs related to fluid management in individuals undergoing haemodialysis. The findings could inform the development of person‐centered fluid management strategies for these individuals. Reporting Method We adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI