医学
泌尿系统
抗生素
入射(几何)
置信区间
人口
内科学
不利影响
预防性抗生素
意向治疗分析
外科
生物
微生物学
环境卫生
光学
物理
作者
Chris Harding,Helen Mossop,Tara Homer,Thomas Chadwick,William King,Sonya Carnell,Jan Lecouturier,Alaa Abouhajar,Luke Vale,Gillian Watson,Rebecca Forbes,Stephanie Currer,Robert Pickard,Ian Eardley,Ian Pearce,Nikesh Thiruchelvam,Karen Guerrero,Katherine Walton,Zahid Hussain,Henry Lazarowicz
出处
期刊:
日期:2022-03-09
卷期号:: e068229-e068229
被引量:76
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj-2021-0068229
摘要
Abstract Objective To test and compare the efficacy of methenamine hippurate for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections with the current standard prophylaxis of daily low dose antibiotics. Design Multicentre, open label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Setting Eight centres in the UK, recruiting from June 2016 to June 2018. Participants Women aged ≥18 years with recurrent urinary tract infections, requiring prophylactic treatment. Interventions Random assignment (1:1, using permuted blocks of variable length via a web based system) to receive antibiotic prophylaxis or methenamine hippurate for 12 months. Treatment allocation was not masked and crossover between arms was allowed. Main outcome measure Absolute difference in incidence of symptomatic, antibiotic treated, urinary tract infections during treatment. A patient and public involvement group predefined the non-inferiority margin as one episode of urinary tract infection per person year. Analyses performed in a modified intention-to-treat population comprised all participants observed for at least six months. Results Participants were randomly assigned to antibiotic prophylaxis (n=120) or methenamine hippurate (n=120). The modified intention-to-treat analysis comprised 205 (85%) participants (antibiotics, n=102 (85%); methenamine hippurate, n=103 (86%)). Incidence of antibiotic treated urinary tract infections during the 12 month treatment period was 0.89 episodes per person year (95% confidence interval 0.65 to 1.12) in the antibiotics group and 1.38 (1.05 to 1.72) in the methenamine hippurate group, with an absolute difference of 0.49 (90% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.84) confirming non-inferiority. Adverse reactions were reported by 34/142 (24%) in the antibiotic group and 35/127 (28%) in the methenamine group and most reactions were mild. Conclusion Non-antibiotic prophylactic treatment with methenamine hippurate might be appropriate for women with a history of recurrent episodes of urinary tract infections, informed by patient preferences and antibiotic stewardship initiatives, given the demonstration of non-inferiority to daily antibiotic prophylaxis seen in this trial. Trial registration ISRCTN70219762 .
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI