氯氮平
电休克疗法
医学
梅德林
荟萃分析
心情
系统回顾
精神科
临床试验
随机对照试验
重症监护医学
精神分裂症(面向对象编程)
内科学
政治学
法学
作者
Elias Wagner,Lisa Löhrs,Dan Siskind,William G. Honer,Peter Falkai,Alkomiet Hasan
标识
DOI:10.1177/0269881118822171
摘要
Background: Treatment options for clozapine resistance are diverse whereas, in contrast, the evidence for augmentation or combination strategies is sparse. Aims: We aimed to extract levels of evidence from available data and extrapolate recommendations for clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed/MEDLINE database and in the Cochrane database. Included meta-analyses were assessed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria, with symptom improvement as the endpoint, in order to develop a recommendation grade for each clinical strategy identified. Results: Our search identified 21 meta-analyses of clozapine combination or augmentation strategies. No strategies met Grade A criteria. Strategies meeting Grade B included combinations with first- or second-generation antipsychotics, augmentation with electroconvulsive therapy for persistent positive symptoms, and combination with certain antidepressants (fluoxetine, duloxetine, citalopram) for persistent negative symptoms. Augmentation strategies with mood-stabilisers, anticonvulsants, glutamatergics, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation or cognitive behavioural therapy met Grades C–D criteria only. Conclusion: More high-quality clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of add-on treatments for symptom improvement in patients with clozapine resistance. Applying definitions of clozapine resistance would improve the reporting of future clinical trials. Augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics and first-generation antipsychotics can be beneficial, but the supporting evidence is from low-quality studies. Electroconvulsive therapy may be effective for clozapine-resistant positive symptoms.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI