Inflammatory risk stratification individualizes anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy for acute type A aortic dissection

•An inflammatory risk model is developed to predict multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) surgery•The differences in inflammatory risk probabilities likely modify the association between ulinastatin use and MODS after ATAAD surgery•Inflammatory risk stratification can help individualize anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy, highlighting the need for precision theranostics in ATAAD surgery The systemic benefits of anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy vary across cardiovascular diseases in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the application of artificial intelligence to acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients to determine the optimal target population who would benefit from urinary trypsin inhibitor use (ulinastatin). Patient characteristics at admission in the Chinese multicenter 5A study database (2016–2022) were used to develop an inflammatory risk model to predict multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). The population (5,126 patients from 15 hospitals) was divided into a 60% sample for model derivation, with the remaining 40% used for model validation. Next, we trained an extreme gradient-boosting algorithm (XGBoost) to develop a parsimonious patient-level inflammatory risk model for predicting MODS. Finally, a top-six-feature tool consisting of estimated glomerular filtration rate, leukocyte count, platelet count, De Ritis ratio, hemoglobin, and albumin was built and showed adequate predictive performance regarding its discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility in derivation and validation cohorts. By individual risk probability and treatment effect, our analysis identified individuals with differential benefit from ulinastatin use (risk ratio [RR] for MODS of RR 0.802 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.656, 0.981] for the predicted risk of 23.5%–41.6%; RR 1.196 [0.698–2.049] for the predicted risk of <23.5%; RR 0.922 [95% CI 0.816–1.042] for the predicted risk of >41.6%). By using artificial intelligence to define an individual's benefit based on the risk probability and treatment effect prediction, we found that individual differences in risk probability likely have important effects on ulinastatin treatment and outcome, which highlights the need for individualizing the selection of optimal anti-inflammatory treatment goals for ATAAD patients. The systemic benefits of anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy vary across cardiovascular diseases in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the application of artificial intelligence to acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients to determine the optimal target population who would benefit from urinary trypsin inhibitor use (ulinastatin). Patient characteristics at admission in the Chinese multicenter 5A study database (2016–2022) were used to develop an inflammatory risk model to predict multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). The population (5,126 patients from 15 hospitals) was divided into a 60% sample for model derivation, with the remaining 40% used for model validation. Next, we trained an extreme gradient-boosting algorithm (XGBoost) to develop a parsimonious patient-level inflammatory risk model for predicting MODS. Finally, a top-six-feature tool consisting of estimated glomerular filtration rate, leukocyte count, platelet count, De Ritis ratio, hemoglobin, and albumin was built and showed adequate predictive performance regarding its discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility in derivation and validation cohorts. By individual risk probability and treatment effect, our analysis identified individuals with differential benefit from ulinastatin use (risk ratio [RR] for MODS of RR 0.802 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.656, 0.981] for the predicted risk of 23.5%–41.6%; RR 1.196 [0.698–2.049] for the predicted risk of <23.5%; RR 0.922 [95% CI 0.816–1.042] for the predicted risk of >41.6%). By using artificial intelligence to define an individual's benefit based on the risk probability and treatment effect prediction, we found that individual differences in risk probability likely have important effects on ulinastatin treatment and outcome, which highlights the need for individualizing the selection of optimal anti-inflammatory treatment goals for ATAAD patients.