Hemodynamic Profiles and Clinical Response to Transcatheter Mitral Repair

Prediction of the clinical response to transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a vexing challenge.This study sought to examine the relation between hemodynamic profiles and outcomes following mitral TEER.Among 378 patients (median age 82 years; 43.9% women), 3 hemodynamic profiles using residual left atrial pressure (LAP) and mitral regurgitation (MR) were defined: type I (optimal), grade ≤1 MR and mean LAP (mLAP) ≤15 mm Hg; type II (mixed), MR grade >1 or mLAP >15 mm Hg; and type III (poor), MR grade >1 and mLAP >15 mm Hg. The discrimination of these profiles for predicting outcomes was examined. A positive clinical response to TEER was defined as improvement in New York Heart Association functional class ≥I grade at 1 year without heart failure rehospitalization or death.There were 148 (39.0%) patients classified as optimal (type I), 187 (49.0%) patients as mixed (type II), and 43 (11.0%) patients as poor (type III). For all-cause mortality, survival at 1 year was 91.6%, 82.6%, and 67.9% for types I, II, and III, respectively (HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.44-3.15; P < 0.001). For the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure, event-free survival at 1 year was 84.1%, 70.7%, and 53.2% for types I, II, and III, respectively (HR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.41-2.65; P < 0.001). Hemodynamic profiling was strongly associated with a positive response to TEER, occurring in 73.9%, 57.0%, 35.0%, for types I, II, and III, respectively (P < 0.001).In patients undergoing mitral TEER, hemodynamic profiling is prognostic, with superior survival occurring among patients with optimal reduction in MR and normal postprocedural LAP.