Urinary incontinence and use of incontinence surgery after radical prostatectomy: a national study using patient‐reported outcomes

Objectives To investigate whether patient‐reported urinary incontinence (UI) and bother scores after radical prostatectomy (RP) result in subsequent intervention with UI surgery. Patients and Methods Men diagnosed with prostate cancer in the English National Health Service between April 2014 and January 2016 were identified. Administrative data were used to identify men who had undergone a RP and those who subsequently underwent a UI procedure. The National Prostate Cancer Audit database was used to identify men who had also completed a post‐treatment survey. These surveys included the Expanded Prostate Cancer Composite Index (EPIC‐26). The frequency of subsequent UI procedures, within 6 months of the survey, was explored according to EPIC‐26 UI scores. The relationship between ‘good’ (≥75) or ‘bad’ (≤25) EPIC‐26 UI scores and perceptions of urinary bother was also explored (responses ranging from ‘no problem’ to ‘big problem’ with respect to their urinary function). Results We identified 11 290 men who had undergone a RP. The 3‐year cumulative incidence of UI surgery was 2.5%. After exclusions, we identified 5165 men who had also completed a post‐treatment survey after a median time of 19 months (response rate 74%). A total of 481 men (9.3%) reported a ‘bad’ UI score and 207 men (4.0%) also reported that they had a big problem with their urinary function. In all, 47 men went on to have UI surgery within 6 months of survey completion (0.9%), of whom 93.6% had a bad UI score. Of the 71 men with the worst UI score (zero), only 11 men (15.5%) subsequently had UI surgery. Conclusion In England, there is a significant number of men living with severe, bothersome UI after RP, and an unmet clinical need for UI surgery. The systematic collection of patient‐reported outcomes could be used to identify men who may benefit from UI surgery.