医学
再狭窄
临床终点
内科学
随机对照试验
置信区间
狭窄
支架
冲程(发动机)
危险系数
心脏病学
入射(几何)
多中心试验
椎动脉
外科
多中心研究
工程类
物理
光学
机械工程
作者
Jichang Luo,Changchun Jiang,Haibo Wang,Ruchao Peng,Tao Wang,Dong Kuai,Guobiao Liang,Feng Wang,Shouchun Wang,Chenghua Xu,Wenhuo Chen,Jianping Deng,Xingyue Hu,Shu Wan,Bing Li,Bo Yin,Yifeng Du,Guangsen Cheng,Jieqing Wan,Xingyu Chen
标识
DOI:10.1177/17474930251377055
摘要
Background: Vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) is a common cause of posterior circulation ischemic events, and endovascular treatment serves as an alternative treatment. However, conventional endovascular treatment methods are related to high risk of restenosis. It is unclear whether the drug-coated balloon (DCB) can reduce restenosis risk of VAOS. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial conducted from 6 January 2020 to 1 October 2023 in China. Symptomatic patients with severe VAOS were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either DCB or bare-metal stent (BMS) and followed up for 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days post-procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of 12-month restenosis. Results: A total of 179 patients were enrolled with 91 in the DCB group and 88 in the BMS group. No significant difference was observed in the rates of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days between the DCB and BMS groups (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (1.1%); P = 0.49). The 12-month restenosis rate was significantly lower in the DCB group compared to the BMS group (10/76 (13.2%) vs. 27/76 (35.5%); risk ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval = 0.19 to 0.71; P = 0.001). Conclusion: This trial demonstrated that DCB may reduce restenosis risk in symptomatic patients with severe VAOS compared to BMS. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT03910166).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI