The Combined Suture Bridge With Mason-Allen Technique Is Superior to the Conventional Suture Bridge Technique for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Purpose

To compare clinical results and retear rates between the combined suture bridge with Mason-Allen (SBMA) technique and the conventional suture bridge (SB) technique in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Methods

One hundred two patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the SB technique (n = 50) or SBMA technique (n = 52) for a full-thickness rotator cuff tear and had at least 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed before surgery and 2 years after to determine preoperative tear size, Goutallier stage, and presence of retear after surgery. Patients were clinically evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score.

Results

The groups did not significantly differ in terms of follow-up period, age, sex, tear size, Goutallier stage, or number of suture anchors. The retear rate was significantly lower in the SBMA group (7.7% vs 28.0%; P < .01). The JOA score was significantly higher at last follow-up than before surgery in both groups (P <.01). The JOA score at last follow-up was significantly higher in the SBMA group (P = .02).

Conclusions

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the SBMA technique may provide better clinical and anatomical outcomes than the conventional SB technique.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort design; treatment study).