Effect of vortioxetine versus venlafaxine on cognitive functions in adults with major depressive disorder: A randomized-controlled trial

沃替西汀 文拉法辛 斯特罗普效应 重性抑郁障碍 心理学 精神科 蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁评定量表 随机对照试验 认知 临床心理学 医学 内科学 焦虑 抗抑郁药
作者
Chayan Kanti Manna,Rajeev Ranjan,Pankaj Kumar,Shamshad Ahmad,Santanu Nath
出处
期刊:Indian Journal of Psychiatry [Medknow]
卷期号:65 (8): 815-824 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_160_23
摘要

ABSTRACT Background: Vortioxetine and venlafaxine are antidepressants which have shown established efficacy to treat major depressive disorder (MDD). There are no studies that compared them for their efficacy in cognitive symptoms of depression. The study aimed to compare the effect of vortioxetine and venlafaxine on the change in cognitive scores in adults with MDD. Methods: The present study was an open-label, active-controlled parallel design randomized clinical trial. After randomization, baseline clinical evaluations by Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) were done and coding (subset of WAIS-IV), WCST, TMT, Stroop test, PGI memory were used to assess cognition in 100 unmedicated MDD patients. They were reassessed after eight weeks of monotherapy with vortioxetine or venlafaxine. Results: Primary cognitive measure (coding score) was found to be significantly higher (Mean Difference = 0.680; 95% CI:.202 to 1.158; P = 0.006) in vortioxetine in comparison with venlafaxine. Stroop test scores (word score, color score, color–word score) were also found to be significantly higher with vortioxetine. In other cognitive measures (WCST scores: total trials, total errors score, total perseverative responses score, total perseverative errors scores; TMT-A and B scores), a significant decrease in scores with vortioxetine in comparison with venlafaxine were observed. A significant decrease in MADRS and increase in SOFAS scores were observed with vortioxetine in comparison with venlafaxine. Both the drugs alleviated the symptoms of depression but vortioxetine was better tolerated. Conclusion: Our study findings suggest that improvement in cognitive scores is significantly higher with vortioxetine than venlafaxine over the eight weeks of monotherapy. Clinical Trial registration number: CTRI/2020/07/026819 (Registered with Clinical Trials Registry- India).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
YHWang完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
瘦瘦爆米花完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
伈X发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
共享精神应助23232采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
qi完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
橘子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
科研通AI6.2应助小花排草采纳,获得20
7秒前
Jw完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
笨笨醉薇发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
xifala完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
伶俐的不尤完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
昭昭完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
21发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
充电宝应助橘子采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
慕青应助叶远望采纳,获得10
11秒前
JunpengGuo完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
聪明绝顶完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
科目三应助Xiu采纳,获得10
12秒前
伈X完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
巴拉巴拉发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
14秒前
五秒发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
Winnie完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
yy发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
23232发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
追人的风筝完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
鱼儿发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
思源应助笨笨醉薇采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
Happy完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6029980
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7703514
关于积分的说明 16191583
捐赠科研通 5176971
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2770375
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1753766
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1639353