溶栓
观察研究
医学
冲程(发动机)
血压
急性中风
还原(数学)
星团(航天器)
缺血性中风
急诊医学
物理疗法
心脏病学
内科学
缺血
组织纤溶酶原激活剂
计算机科学
工程类
程序设计语言
心肌梗塞
机械工程
数学
几何学
作者
Thomas P. Zonneveld,Sarah E. Vermeer,Erik W. van Zwet,Adrien E.D. Groot,Ale Algra,Leo A.M. Aerden,Kees C.L. Alblas,Frank de Beer,Paul J.A.M. Brouwers,Koen de Gans,H. Maarten A. van Gemert,Bart C A M van Ginneken,Gerke S Grooters,Patricia H.A. Halkes,Tonny A M H G van der Heijden-Montfroy,Korné Jellema,Sonja W. de Jong,Harry Lövenich-Ciccarello,Willem D M van der Meulen,Edwin W Peters
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00177-7
摘要
Intravenous thrombolysis is contraindicated in patients with ischaemic stroke with blood pressure higher than 185/110 mm Hg. Prevailing guidelines recommend to actively lower blood pressure with intravenous antihypertensive agents to allow for thrombolysis; however, there is no robust evidence for this strategy. Because rapid declines in blood pressure can also adversely affect clinical outcomes, several Dutch stroke centres use a conservative strategy that does not involve the reduction of blood pressure. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of both strategies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI