Effect of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Patients With Low Back Pain: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

医学 物理疗法 随机对照试验 Oswestry残疾指数 荟萃分析 科克伦图书馆 可视模拟标度 腰痛 人口 置信区间 严格标准化平均差 康复 物理医学与康复 内科学 替代医学 环境卫生 病理
作者
Yingxiu Diao,Jiaxin Pan,Yi Xie,Manxia Liao,Daming Wu,Hao Líu,Lin Liao
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier]
卷期号:104 (9): 1526-1538 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.03.016
摘要

ObjectiveThe purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on pain intensity, functional mobility, and kinesiophobia in individuals with low back pain (LBP).Data SourcesThe PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception until November 25, 2022.Study SelectionEligible randomized controlled trials contained information on the population (LBP), intervention (rPMS), and outcomes (pain intensity, functional mobility, and kinesiophobia). Participants in the rPMS intervention group were compared with those in sham or other control groups. Two independent researchers searched for, screened, and qualified the articles.Data ExtractionTwo independent researchers extracted key information from each eligible study. The authors’ names, year of publication, setting, total sample size, rPMS parameters, baseline/mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted using a standardized form, and the methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database score and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system.Data SynthesisOf 733 studies identified, 6 randomized controlled trials (n = 139) were included for meta-analysis. Compared with sham rPMS or other therapy, rPMS showed significant efficacy in reducing pain intensity (visual analog scale: MD, –1.89; 95% CI, –3.32 to –0.47; P<.05; very low-quality evidence). Significant efficacy was also found in terms of functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index: MD, –8.39; 95% CI, –13.65 to –3.12; P<.001; low-quality evidence). However, there was no statistically significant between-group difference on the Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (MD, –1.81; 95% CI, –7.60 to 3.98; P>.05; very low-quality evidence).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis found very low- to low-quality evidence that rPMS can be used to reduce pain intensity and improve functional disability in individuals with LBP. However, no significant effect of rPMS on kinesiophobia was found.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xintaihencha发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
顾矜应助Like采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
乔心发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
xintaihencha完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
稳重的天菱完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Einson发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
无私寄风完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
聪明的破茧完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
145发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
pxptmac完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
bkagyin应助乔心采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
huangxiaoniu发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
bkagyin应助龚成明采纳,获得10
25秒前
jhcdgszjdcb发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
互助遵法尚德应助媛媛乐采纳,获得10
28秒前
31秒前
Hao应助iwin210采纳,获得30
32秒前
无聊的大神完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
33秒前
huangxiaoniu完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
Like发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
Elsa发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
锅子发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
45秒前
joy发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
一根藤发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
Qiiiiii发布了新的文献求助10
51秒前
53秒前
桐桐应助zp采纳,获得10
54秒前
一根藤完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
高分求助中
请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 900
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 800
Multifunctional Agriculture, A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development 600
Bernd Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
A radiographic standard of reference for the growing knee 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2477524
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2141124
关于积分的说明 5458160
捐赠科研通 1864415
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 926822
版权声明 562872
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 495941