已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Using the design-thinking method to develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning (PES-TBL) for nursing students

克朗巴赫阿尔法 结构效度 心理学 验证性因素分析 比例(比率) 同行评估 探索性因素分析 构造(python库) 判别效度 可靠性(半导体) 内容有效性 有效性 应用心理学 医学教育 数学教育 计算机科学 结构方程建模 心理测量学 医学 临床心理学 物理 功率(物理) 机器学习 程序设计语言 量子力学 内部一致性
作者
Young-Ran Kweon,Jungrim Park
出处
期刊:Nurse Education Today [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:127: 105849-105849 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105849
摘要

Peer evaluation in team-based learning provides meaningful information about the learning process and dynamics. Despite the importance of peer evaluation in learner-centred learning, there is a lack of valid and reliable scales that reflect students' experiences in the classroom. To develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A cross-sectional methodological study. Four universities located in Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Eight nursing students exposed to team-based learning voluntarily participated in a design-thinking project, and eight nursing professors were selected for content validity. For the validation of the Scale, 722 nursing students were randomly selected. The design-thinking method was implemented to develop the Scale, and a questionnaire was used to assess the Scale's construct validity and reliability. The construct validity was examined in a split-half analysis with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and composite reliability were investigated for the peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A 12-item tool, with each item using a 5-point scale for peer evaluation, was developed through the empathise, define, ideate, prototype, and test stages of the design-thinking method. Exploratory factor analysis identified three factors from the 12 items: responsibility, initiative, and collaboration. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the tool had acceptable convergent and discriminant validity, thus confirming good construct validity. All values for reliability were >0.70. This study was noteworthy in that it employed the design-thinking method to reflect learners' opinions in developing a peer evaluation instrument. Moreover, the study demonstrated adequate evidence of reliability and validity. Consequently, the developed Scale can be effectively applied to team-based learning assessments for nursing students.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
3秒前
5秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
27小天使应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
6秒前
情怀应助fl采纳,获得10
6秒前
夜夜夜发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
paltahun完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
冷静的尔云完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
闪闪小小完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
李十九发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
re完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
RockRedfoo完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
Forever完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
19秒前
fl发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
虚心怜阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
阿桥完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
酷波er应助丰富的明轩采纳,获得10
25秒前
文艺猫咪完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
天天呼的海角完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
科研通AI5应助李十九采纳,获得10
32秒前
37秒前
折颜完成签到,获得积分20
39秒前
梦锂铧完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
顾矜应助夜夜夜采纳,获得10
47秒前
淡烟流水完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
53秒前
53秒前
jj完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
56秒前
58秒前
哆啦梦发布了新的文献求助10
58秒前
当里个当发布了新的文献求助10
58秒前
manman完成签到,获得积分10
58秒前
1分钟前
立军发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
orixero应助sujinyu采纳,获得10
1分钟前
zjh完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Периодизация спортивной тренировки. Общая теория и её практическое применение 310
Technologies supporting mass customization of apparel: A pilot project 300
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 300
Political Ideologies Their Origins and Impact 13th Edition 260
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3780726
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3326224
关于积分的说明 10226255
捐赠科研通 3041293
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1669330
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 799040
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758723