Using the design-thinking method to develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning (PES-TBL) for nursing students

克朗巴赫阿尔法 结构效度 心理学 验证性因素分析 比例(比率) 同行评估 探索性因素分析 构造(python库) 判别效度 可靠性(半导体) 内容有效性 有效性 应用心理学 医学教育 数学教育 计算机科学 结构方程建模 心理测量学 医学 临床心理学 物理 功率(物理) 机器学习 程序设计语言 量子力学 内部一致性
作者
Young-Ran Kweon,Jungrim Park
出处
期刊:Nurse Education Today [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:127: 105849-105849 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105849
摘要

Peer evaluation in team-based learning provides meaningful information about the learning process and dynamics. Despite the importance of peer evaluation in learner-centred learning, there is a lack of valid and reliable scales that reflect students' experiences in the classroom. To develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A cross-sectional methodological study. Four universities located in Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Eight nursing students exposed to team-based learning voluntarily participated in a design-thinking project, and eight nursing professors were selected for content validity. For the validation of the Scale, 722 nursing students were randomly selected. The design-thinking method was implemented to develop the Scale, and a questionnaire was used to assess the Scale's construct validity and reliability. The construct validity was examined in a split-half analysis with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and composite reliability were investigated for the peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A 12-item tool, with each item using a 5-point scale for peer evaluation, was developed through the empathise, define, ideate, prototype, and test stages of the design-thinking method. Exploratory factor analysis identified three factors from the 12 items: responsibility, initiative, and collaboration. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the tool had acceptable convergent and discriminant validity, thus confirming good construct validity. All values for reliability were >0.70. This study was noteworthy in that it employed the design-thinking method to reflect learners' opinions in developing a peer evaluation instrument. Moreover, the study demonstrated adequate evidence of reliability and validity. Consequently, the developed Scale can be effectively applied to team-based learning assessments for nursing students.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
文静新烟完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
OKOKOK完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
LiangRen完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
思源应助Pzuzu采纳,获得10
4秒前
尘尘笑发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
桐桐应助文静新烟采纳,获得10
6秒前
zzzzzzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
顾矜应助赵吉思汗采纳,获得10
6秒前
传奇3应助我真没想重生啊采纳,获得10
7秒前
ther发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
英姑应助科研爵士圣体采纳,获得30
8秒前
lux发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
科研通AI6.3应助kris采纳,获得10
10秒前
Sou完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
chuan完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
从容紫寒发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
烟花应助湛湛蓝采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
lux完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
珊明治发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
鲸1107发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
17秒前
17秒前
共享精神应助茴香采纳,获得10
18秒前
亓灬完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
陈酒发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
单薄含巧发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
huhuhuxue1发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
亓灬发布了新的文献求助20
22秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Arthritis and Related Conditions, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7287563
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8907316
关于积分的说明 18850907
捐赠科研通 6956403
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3208630
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2378499
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2184289