科克伦图书馆
医学
荟萃分析
安慰剂
置信区间
随机对照试验
糖尿病性黄斑水肿
不利影响
严格标准化平均差
相对风险
出版偏见
糖尿病
替代医学
糖尿病性视网膜病变
内科学
内分泌学
病理
作者
Zhipeng Hu,Chunguang Xie,Maoyi Yang,Xiaoxu Fu,Hong Gao,Ya Liu,Hongyan Xie
摘要
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Qiming granule (QG) on diabetic macular edema (DME). PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, qvip and China Biology Medicine Disc were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about participants with a diagnosis of DME were included. Risk of bias assessment was conducted by Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool for RCT. Random‐effects model was implemented to pool results. Among 16 included studies, QG combined with conventional treatment was administered 13.5 g daily for a period ranging from 2 to 6 months. Results showed combination therapy was more effective than conventional treatment alone in central macular thickness (weighted mean difference (WMD) = −29.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) (−39.56 to −19.29), p = .0001), optimum corrected vision (pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.962, 95%CI (−1.35 to −0.57), p = .0001) and overall effective rate (RR = 1.25, 95%CI = [1.13 to 1.35], p < .0001). Only three studies reported adverse effects. The quality of evidence is low. Due to a lack of placebo control, the net efficacy of QG is still uncertain. More high‐quality RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of QG in DME.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI