离心机
液化
地震振动台
孔隙水压力
岩土工程
地下水位
膨胀的
地质学
沉积(地质)
流离失所(心理学)
沉积作用
饱和(图论)
地下水
地貌学
沉积物
物理
核物理学
心理学
数学
组合数学
心理治疗师
作者
Jahangir Alam,Ikuo Towhata,Adolfo Santini,Nicola Moraci
出处
期刊:Nucleation and Atmospheric Aerosols
日期:2008-01-01
被引量:3
摘要
Physical modeling of liquefaction in 1‐g shaking table and dynamic centrifuge test become very popular to simulate the ground behavior during earthquake motion. 1‐g shaking table tests require scaled down model ground which can be prepared in three methods; water sedimentation, moist tamping and dry deposition method. Moist tamping and dry deposition method need saturation of model ground which is expensive and very difficult to achieve. Some model tests were performed in 1‐g shaking table to see the influence of preparation method of model ground. Wet tamping and water sedimentation method of ground preparation were compared in these tests. Behavior of level ground and slope were also examined. Slope and level ground model test increased the understanding of excess pore pressure generation in both cases. Wet tamping method has a possibility of not being fully saturated. Pore pressure transducers should be fixed vertically so that it can not settle down during shaking but can move with ground. There was insignificant difference in acceleration and excess pore pressure responses between wet tamping and water sedimentation method in case of level ground. Spiky accelerations were prominent in slope prepared by water sedimentation method. Spiky accelerations were the result of lateral displacement induced dilatancy of soil.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI