作者
Niels WCJ van de Donk,Mounzer Agha,Adam D. Cohen,Yaël Cohen,Sébastien Anguille,Tessa Kerre,Wilfried Roeloffzen,Jordan M. Schecter,Kevin C. De Braganca,Carolyn C. Jackson,Helen Varsos,Pankaj Mistry,Tito Roccia,Xiaoying Xu,Katherine Li,Enrique Zudaire,Christina Corsale,Muhammad Akram,Dong Geng,Lida Pacaud,Pieter Sonneveld,Sonja Zweegman
摘要
Introduction: In cohort B of the multicohort phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) study, the efficacy and safety of cilta-cel are being evaluated in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who had early relapse (≤12 months after autologous stem cell transplant [ASCT] or ≤12 months after start of initial treatment with anti-myeloma therapy). Because progression within 1 year of starting initial therapy is a poor prognostic factor, with overall survival <2 years in these patients, they have functionally high-risk disease and represent an unmet medical need. We present updated clinical results and cytokine analyses. Methods: Eligible patients had MM, received 1 prior line of therapy (proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug required), had early disease progression (≤12 mo after ASCT or ≤12 mo after start of anti-myeloma therapy for patients who did not undergo ASCT), and were treatment-naive to CAR-T/anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) therapies. Bridging therapy was allowed between apheresis and CAR-T cell infusion. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was given post lymphodepletion. Safety and efficacy were assessed. The primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity by next generation sequencing at 10-5. Management strategies were implemented to minimize risk of movement/neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (MNTs)/parkinsonism. Pharmacokinetics, CAR-T cell phenotype, and cytokine profiles are also being investigated. Results: As of June 1, 2022, 19 patients (median age 58 years [range 44-67]; 74% male; 16% high-risk cytogenetics, 63.2% standard risk, 21.1% unknown) received cilta-cel and 16 remained on study. Median follow-up was 17.8 months (range 5.2-26.3). 79% of patients received prior ASCT. Overall response rate was 100%, with 100% achieving very good partial response or better, and 90% achieving complete response or better (Figure). Median time to first response and best response were 0.95 months (range 0.9 - 9.7) and 5.1 months (range 0.9 - 11.8), respectively. Of patients who were MRD-evaluable (n= 15), 14 (93 %) achieved MRD 10-5 negativity during the study. Median DOR was not reached and 12-month event-free rate was 84%. The 12-month progression-free survival rate was 90%. Most common treatment-emergent AEs were hematologic (grade 3/4: neutropenia, 90%; lymphopenia, 42%; thrombocytopenia, 26%; leukopenia, 26%). Median time from cilta-cel infusion to onset of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 8 days (range 5-11) and occurred in 16 (84.2%) patients (grade 4, n=1). CRS resolved in all patients. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (grade 1) occurred in 1 patient and Movement and neurocognitive TEAEs/parkinsonism (grade 3) occurred in 1 patient (previously reported). Three patients died post cilta-cel at days 158, 417, and 451 due to progressive disease. Levels of interleukin (IL)-6, interferon gamma, IL-2Rα, and IL-10 increased post infusion, peaked at days 7-14, coincident with the timing of CRS, and returned to baseline levels within 2-3 months post infusion. Conclusions: In this functionally high-risk patient population, all of whom relapsed within a year of treatment with standard of care upfront therapy (including 79% with ASCT), 90% remained progression-free at 1 year post cilta-cel infusion. Results at this longer (18 months) follow-up show durability and deepening of response to cilta-cel and maintenance of PFS rate. This represents a potentially significant advancement in a population with high unmet need. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal