Emmetropic eye growth in East Asians and non‐East Asians

Abstract Purpose To compare axial length (AL) growth curves in East Asian (EA) and non‐EA emmetropes. Methods A meta‐regression of 28 studies with emmetrope‐specific AL data (measured with optical biometry) was performed. Emmetropia was defined as spherical equivalent refraction (SER) between −0.50 and +1.25 D, determined under cycloplegia if the mean age was ≤20 years. The AL growth curve (mean AL vs. mean age) was first fitted to the full dataset using a weighted nonlinear mixed‐effects model, before refitting the model with ethnicity as a two‐level grouping variable (EA vs. non‐EA). Ethnic differences in growth curve parameters were tested using the Wald test. Results A total of 3331 EA and 1071 non‐EA emmetropes (mean age: 6.5–23.1 years) were included. There was no evidence of an ethnic difference in either final AL (difference: 0.15 mm, 95% CI: −0.04 to 0.35 mm, p = 0.15) or initial AL, as represented by the amount that the final AL needed to be offset to obtain the y ‐intercept (difference: −2.77 mm, 95% CI: −10.97 to 5.44, p = 0.51). Likewise, AL growth rate (curve steepness) did not differ between ethnic groups (difference: 0.09, 95% CI: −0.13 to 0.31, p = 0.43). Collectively, AL growth rate decreased from 0.24 mm/year at 6 years of age to around 0.05 mm/year at 11 years of age, after which it dipped below the repeatability of optical biometry (±0.04 mm) and practically plateaued around 16 years of age (final AL: 23.60 mm). Conclusions EA and non‐EA emmetropes have comparable AL growth curves.