指南
医学遗传学
遗传学
生物
基因检测
基因
分子病理学
医学
生物信息学
计算生物学
病理
作者
Eungjun Yoon,Jong Kwon Lee,Taek Kyu Park,Sung‐A Chang,June Huh,Jong-Won Kim,Duk‐Kyung Kim,Ja‐Hyun Jang
标识
DOI:10.1136/jmg-2023-109433
摘要
Abstract Background Despite the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association of Molecular Pathology (AMP) guideline, many variants of FBN1 gene remain inconclusive. In line with publication of the FBN1- specific variant interpretation guideline by ClinGen in 2022, we reassessed variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in FBN1 gene found in our institution. Methods VUS found in the course of FBN1 sequencing between December 2015 and April 2022 were reassessed based on FBN1 -specific variant interpretation guideline, review of updated literatures and additional genetic tests including family study and/or RNA study if available. Results Out of 695 patients who underwent FBN1 sequencing, 61 VUS were found in 69 patients. Among them, 38 VUS in 43 patients (62.3%) were reclassified as pathogenic and likely pathogenic variant ((L)PV), including 20 novel (L)PV. Major causes of reclassification were: (1) gene-specific modification of ACMG/AMP criteria, (2) updated literatures and (3) additional genetic tests. The most important evidence for reclassification was clarification of critical amino acid residues. Conclusions After reassessing FBN1 variants according to FBN1 -specific guideline and up-to-date database, a significant number of VUS was reclassified. Clinical laboratories are encouraged to perform variant reassessment at regular intervals or when there is a major change in the principle of variant interpretation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI