Community based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people: systematic review and network meta-analysis

心理干预 奇纳 荟萃分析 梅德林 随机对照试验 心理信息 老年学 日常生活活动 物理疗法 医学 精神科 外科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Thomas F Crocker,Joie Ensor,Natalie Lam,Magda Jordão,Ram Bajpai,M. Gene Bond,Anne Förster,Richard D. Riley,Deirdre Andre,Caroline Brundle,Alison Ellwood,John R. Green,Matthew Hale,Lubena Mirza,Jessica Morgan,Ismail Patel,Eleftheria Patetsini,Matthew Prescott,Ridha Ramiz,Oliver Todd,Rebecca Walford,John Gladman,Andrew Clegg
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj-2023-077764
摘要

Abstract Objective To synthesise evidence of the effectiveness of community based complex interventions, grouped according to their intervention components, to sustain independence for older people. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to 9 August 2021 and reference lists of included studies. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials or cluster randomised controlled trials with ≥24 weeks’ follow-up studying community based complex interventions for sustaining independence in older people (mean age ≥65 years) living at home, with usual care, placebo, or another complex intervention as comparators. Main outcomes Living at home, activities of daily living (personal/instrumental), care home placement, and service/economic outcomes at 12 months. Data synthesis Interventions were grouped according to a specifically developed typology. Random effects network meta-analysis estimated comparative effects; Cochrane’s revised tool (RoB 2) structured risk of bias assessment. Grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) network meta-analysis structured certainty assessment. Results The review included 129 studies (74 946 participants). Nineteen intervention components, including “multifactorial action from individualised care planning” (a process of multidomain assessment and management leading to tailored actions), were identified in 63 combinations. For living at home, compared with no intervention/placebo, evidence favoured multifactorial action from individualised care planning including medication review and regular follow-ups (routine review) (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.59; moderate certainty); multifactorial action from individualised care planning including medication review without regular follow-ups (2.55, 0.61 to 10.60; low certainty); combined cognitive training, medication review, nutritional support, and exercise (1.93, 0.79 to 4.77; low certainty); and combined activities of daily living training, nutritional support, and exercise (1.79, 0.67 to 4.76; low certainty). Risk screening or the addition of education and self-management strategies to multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review may reduce odds of living at home. For instrumental activities of daily living, evidence favoured multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review (standardised mean difference 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.21; moderate certainty). Two interventions may reduce instrumental activities of daily living: combined activities of daily living training, aids, and exercise; and combined activities of daily living training, aids, education, exercise, and multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review and self-management strategies. For personal activities of daily living, evidence favoured combined exercise, multifactorial action from individualised care planning, and routine review with medication review and self-management strategies (0.16, −0.51 to 0.82; low certainty). For homecare recipients, evidence favoured addition of multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review (0.60, 0.32 to 0.88; low certainty). High risk of bias and imprecise estimates meant that most evidence was low or very low certainty. Few studies contributed to each comparison, impeding evaluation of inconsistency and frailty. Conclusions The intervention most likely to sustain independence is individualised care planning including medicines optimisation and regular follow-up reviews resulting in multifactorial action. Homecare recipients may particularly benefit from this intervention. Unexpectedly, some combinations may reduce independence. Further research is needed to investigate which combinations of interventions work best for different participants and contexts. Registration PROSPERO CRD42019162195.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
haoran_man发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
朴素的寒荷完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
橘子味的北冰洋完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
传奇3应助lvsehx采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
www完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
8秒前
香蕉觅云应助yanziwu94采纳,获得10
8秒前
Survivor完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
张蓓蓓发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Zxffei完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
15秒前
停停走走发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
老金金完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
yanziwu94发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
haoran_man完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
CipherSage应助停停走走采纳,获得10
23秒前
sci完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
25秒前
木冉完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
外向的沛柔关注了科研通微信公众号
27秒前
停停走走完成签到,获得积分20
29秒前
小二郎应助1111采纳,获得20
32秒前
叶子完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
赵银志发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
38秒前
母单花完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
木穹完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
归雁发布了新的文献求助10
46秒前
青基立项完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
orixero应助阿俊1212采纳,获得10
48秒前
hadfunsix完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
科研通AI5应助飘逸妙柏采纳,获得10
50秒前
1111完成签到 ,获得积分20
50秒前
慕青应助枫叶采纳,获得10
51秒前
阡陌完成签到,获得积分10
53秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 104th edition 1000
Izeltabart tapatansine - AdisInsight 600
Introduction to Comparative Public Administration Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe, Third Edition 3rd edition 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3761774
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3305540
关于积分的说明 10134658
捐赠科研通 3019564
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1658226
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 791989
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 754751