Community based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people: systematic review and network meta-analysis

心理干预 奇纳 荟萃分析 梅德林 随机对照试验 心理信息 老年学 日常生活活动 物理疗法 医学 精神科 外科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Thomas F Crocker,Joie Ensor,Natalie Lam,Magda Jordão,Ram Bajpai,M. Gene Bond,Anne Förster,Richard D. Riley,Deirdre Andre,Caroline Brundle,Alison Ellwood,John R. Green,Matthew Hale,Lubena Mirza,Jessica Morgan,Ismail Patel,Eleftheria Patetsini,Matthew Prescott,Ridha Ramiz,Oliver Todd,Rebecca Walford,John Gladman,Andrew Clegg
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj-2023-077764
摘要

Abstract Objective To synthesise evidence of the effectiveness of community based complex interventions, grouped according to their intervention components, to sustain independence for older people. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to 9 August 2021 and reference lists of included studies. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials or cluster randomised controlled trials with ≥24 weeks’ follow-up studying community based complex interventions for sustaining independence in older people (mean age ≥65 years) living at home, with usual care, placebo, or another complex intervention as comparators. Main outcomes Living at home, activities of daily living (personal/instrumental), care home placement, and service/economic outcomes at 12 months. Data synthesis Interventions were grouped according to a specifically developed typology. Random effects network meta-analysis estimated comparative effects; Cochrane’s revised tool (RoB 2) structured risk of bias assessment. Grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) network meta-analysis structured certainty assessment. Results The review included 129 studies (74 946 participants). Nineteen intervention components, including “multifactorial action from individualised care planning” (a process of multidomain assessment and management leading to tailored actions), were identified in 63 combinations. For living at home, compared with no intervention/placebo, evidence favoured multifactorial action from individualised care planning including medication review and regular follow-ups (routine review) (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.59; moderate certainty); multifactorial action from individualised care planning including medication review without regular follow-ups (2.55, 0.61 to 10.60; low certainty); combined cognitive training, medication review, nutritional support, and exercise (1.93, 0.79 to 4.77; low certainty); and combined activities of daily living training, nutritional support, and exercise (1.79, 0.67 to 4.76; low certainty). Risk screening or the addition of education and self-management strategies to multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review may reduce odds of living at home. For instrumental activities of daily living, evidence favoured multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review (standardised mean difference 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.21; moderate certainty). Two interventions may reduce instrumental activities of daily living: combined activities of daily living training, aids, and exercise; and combined activities of daily living training, aids, education, exercise, and multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review and self-management strategies. For personal activities of daily living, evidence favoured combined exercise, multifactorial action from individualised care planning, and routine review with medication review and self-management strategies (0.16, −0.51 to 0.82; low certainty). For homecare recipients, evidence favoured addition of multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review (0.60, 0.32 to 0.88; low certainty). High risk of bias and imprecise estimates meant that most evidence was low or very low certainty. Few studies contributed to each comparison, impeding evaluation of inconsistency and frailty. Conclusions The intervention most likely to sustain independence is individualised care planning including medicines optimisation and regular follow-up reviews resulting in multifactorial action. Homecare recipients may particularly benefit from this intervention. Unexpectedly, some combinations may reduce independence. Further research is needed to investigate which combinations of interventions work best for different participants and contexts. Registration PROSPERO CRD42019162195.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
杨烨华发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
4秒前
阿翼完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
科研小民工应助南瓜豚采纳,获得40
6秒前
罗是一完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
井水饮处完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
尊敬西装发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
胖肉肉发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
杨烨华完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
10秒前
今后应助111采纳,获得30
10秒前
10秒前
moonlin完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
Cker完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
彭于晏应助胖肉肉采纳,获得10
13秒前
Obliviate完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
学术搭子完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
慢慢子完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
芳蔼发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
鹏笑完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
科研通AI2S应助乐观的非笑采纳,获得20
15秒前
悦耳问筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
betty2009发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
英勇含烟发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
鑫儿发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
迪鸣完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
pattrick发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
sushx完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
顺利小鸭子完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
酷波er应助成就的白羊采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
研友_8RlXEn完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
DC-liqingtian发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
花生完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
欣慰的星月完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
fff完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
Unusual formation of 4-diazo-3-nitriminopyrazoles upon acid nitration of pyrazolo[3,4-d][1,2,3]triazoles 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3671619
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3228325
关于积分的说明 9779523
捐赠科研通 2938636
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1610158
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 760547
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 736093