Disparities in Medical Assessment Practices for Adolescents at Risk for Eating Disorders

Purpose The United States Preventative Services Task Force found insufficient evidence to support universal screening for eating disorders (EDs) but did recommend assessing high-risk adolescents through laboratory tests, close follow-up, and referrals to other specialties. Yet, it is unclear whether youth at high risk for EDs receive such assessment and whether patient characteristics influence such practices. Methods Using the Rochester Epidemiological Project, we identified adolescents (13–18 years) at risk for EDs (i.e., weight loss, underweight, or loss of appetite not explained by a medical condition) who presented for a medical appointment between January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2017 (n = 662; M age = 15.8 years; 66% female; 76% white). Patient and visit characteristics, assessment practices (i.e., tests, referrals, and follow-up), and ED diagnoses within 5 years following index visit were extracted. Results Adolescents who received referrals to other providers were 4 times more likely to be diagnosed with a future ED (p < .001) and were diagnosed 137.8 days sooner (Est = −137.8, p = .04) compared to those who did not receive referrals. Compared to males, females were 2.2 times more likely to receive referrals (p < .001). Compared to those presenting at a lower body mass index, adolescents with a higher body mass index were more likely to receive medical tests (HR = 1.0, p < .01) and less likely to receive recommendations to improve eating/weight (HR = 0.99, p < .01) or follow up visits (HR = 0.99, p < .01). Discussion Disparities in assessment practices for adolescents at high-risk for EDs underscore the need for improved tools to enhance early detection and treatment.