中国仓鼠卵巢细胞
计算生物学
生物过程
生物
卵泡抑素
生物制药
生物技术
细胞培养
细胞生物学
遗传学
古生物学
作者
Yiwen Jiang,Lingxi Jiang,Zhongwei Yang,Xiaolin Liu,Yaoyao Wang,Ying Man,He Huang,Yiren Xu,Hang Zhou,Jincui Huang,Xuejun Gu,Weichang Zhou,Ying Huang
摘要
Abstract In recent years, accelerating Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) workflows for clinical entry has become a critical focus in biologics development. Advances in the development of cell lines, cell culture processes, and analytical technologies have enabled the generation of more homogeneous stable pool populations with increased productivity. Leveraging the experience gained from the COVID‐19 product development, the strategic use of stable cell pools or a pool of clones for early‐stage non‐GMP material generation and process development has proven transformative in significantly reducing the CMC timeline to investigational new drug (IND). This study provides a comprehensive comparison of bioprocess performance and product quality attributes of materials produced from stable pools or a pool of clones (toxicology study materials) versus those from clonally derived cells (GMP clinical batches) across six First‐in‐Human (FIH) programs involving mAbs, bsAb, and Fc‐fusion proteins. The results demonstrate a strong alignment and the feasibility of using protein materials from stable pools or a pool of clones in toxicology studies. In conclusion, utilizing non‐clonal CHO cell‐derived material for preclinical studies offers a strategic approach that can be broadly applied to complex molecules across various disease areas, even under standard regulatory filings, accelerating the path to clinical trials.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI