背景(考古学)
计算机科学
爆炸物
反射(计算机编程)
实证研究
可靠性(半导体)
冲击波
路径(计算)
功能(生物学)
休克(循环)
冲击波
点(几何)
物理
数学
机械
地质学
统计
几何学
医学
古生物学
功率(物理)
化学
有机化学
量子力学
进化生物学
生物
程序设计语言
内科学
作者
Johanna Boutillier,Loïc Ehrhardt,Sébastien de Mezzo,Caroline Deck,Pascal Magnan,P. Naz,Reinhard Willinger
出处
期刊:Shock Waves
[Springer Science+Business Media]
日期:2017-08-21
卷期号:28 (2): 243-252
被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00193-017-0743-7
摘要
With the increasing use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs), the need for better mitigation, either for building integrity or for personal security, increases in importance. Before focusing on the interaction of the shock wave with a target and the potential associated damage, knowledge must be acquired regarding the nature of the blast threat, i.e., the pressure–time history. This requirement motivates gaining further insight into the triple point (TP) path, in order to know precisely which regime the target will encounter (simple reflection or Mach reflection). Within this context, the purpose of this study is to evaluate three existing TP path empirical models, which in turn are used in other empirical models for the determination of the pressure profile. These three TP models are the empirical function of Kinney, the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) curves, and the model of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). As discrepancies are observed between these models, new experimental data were obtained to test their reliability and a new promising formulation is proposed for scaled heights of burst ranging from 24.6–172.9
$$~\hbox {cm}/\hbox {kg}^{1/3}$$
.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI