组内相关
评定量表
共济失调
脊髓小脑共济失调
心理学
等级间信度
克朗巴赫阿尔法
物理疗法
心理测量学
医学
临床心理学
发展心理学
精神科
作者
T. Schmitz-Hübsch,Sophie Tézenas du Montcel,L. Baliko,José Berciano,Sylvia Boesch,Chantal Depondt,Paola Giunti,Christoph Globas,Jon Infante,J.-S. Kang,B. Kremer,Caterina Mariotti,Béla Melegh,M. Pandolfo,Maria Rakowicz,Pascale Ribaı̈,Rafał Rola,Lüdger Schöls,Sandra Szymanski,Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg
出处
期刊:Neurology
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2006-06-12
卷期号:66 (11): 1717-1720
被引量:1715
标识
DOI:10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92
摘要
To develop a reliable and valid clinical scale measuring the severity of ataxia.The authors devised the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and tested it in two trials of 167 and 119 patients with spinocerebellar ataxia.The mean time to administer SARA in patients was 14.2 +/- 7.5 minutes (range 5 to 40). Interrater reliability was high, with an intraclass coefficient (ICC) of 0.98. Test-retest reliability was high with an ICC of 0.90. Internal consistency was high as indicated by Cronbach's alpha of 0.94. Factorial analysis revealed that the rating results were determined by a single factor. SARA ratings showed a linear relation to global assessments using a visual analogue scale, suggesting linearity of the scale (p < 0.0001, r(2) = 0.98). SARA score increased with the disease stage (p < 0.001) and was closely correlated with the Barthel Index (r = -0.80, p < 0.001) and part IV (functional assessment) of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS-IV) (r = -0.89, p < 0.0001), whereas it had only a weak correlation with disease duration (r = 0.34, p < 0.0002).The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia, making it an appropriate primary outcome measure for clinical trials.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI