射血分数
医学
内科学
危险系数
心力衰竭
心脏病学
置信区间
优势比
肺活量测定
运动不耐症
哮喘
作者
D Nagumo,Nobuaki Hamazaki,Kentaro Kamiya,Takashi Miki,Shuken Kobayashi,Kohei Nozaki,Takafumi Ichikawa,Masashi Yamashita,Shota Uchida,Takumi Noda,Kensuke Ueno,Ken Ogura,Emi Maekawa,Minako Yamaoka‐Tojo,Atsuhiko Matsunaga,Junya Ako
出处
期刊:Cardiology
[Karger Publishers]
日期:2024-11-29
卷期号:150 (5): 511-520
被引量:1
摘要
Introduction: Small airway is reportedly more susceptible than central airways in heart failure (HF), which may cause poor outcomes. We investigated clinical significance of small-airway disease (SAD) on exercise intolerance and clinical events in patients with HF and reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods: We studied consecutive patients with HF admitted for medical treatment and measured maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) on spirometry and 6-min walking distance (6MWD) at hospital discharge. SAD and exercise intolerance were defined by MMEF relative to <60% of the predicted value and 6MWD <300 m, respectively. Endpoint was composite clinical events of all-cause death and/or HF readmission. Results: Among 1,016 studied patients, 478 (47.0%) had SAD, the prevalence of which was higher in patients with LVEF ≥40% than LVEF <40%. SAD correlated to 6MWD <300 m (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.49–7.19). This correlation was consistently observed in both LVEF <40% (aOR: 3.99, 95% CI: 1.59–9.98) and LVEF ≥40% (aOR: 4.50, 95% CI: 2.22–9.13). SAD also showed significant associations with high incidences of clinical events in all patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05–1.72) and in LVEF <40% (aHR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.21–2.54) but not in LVEF ≥40% (aHR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.78–1.53). Conclusion: The prevalence of SAD is high in patients with HF, which is associated with exercise intolerance regardless of LVEF. Additionally, SAD may have a predictive significance for clinical events in these patients, especially in LVEF <40%.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI