精神病
心理学
协调
风险评估
精神分裂症(面向对象编程)
临床心理学
精神科
计算机科学
声学
计算机安全
物理
作者
Jean Addington,Scott W. Woods,Alison Yung,Monica E. Calkins,Paolo Fusar‐Poli
摘要
The two most used semi-structured psychometric instruments that define criteria for being at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis are the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) and the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS). Although very similar there are important differences between these two measures. Developing harmonized psychometric criteria for defining CHR and associated outcomes would be beneficial for future research. This article describes the first step in this process by reporting on a NIMH workshop held in Washington DC, in February 2019 that was attended by experts in the field. The aim of this workshop was to examine the similarities and differences between the two measures and consider how the harmonization process could proceed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI