Risk management in pig farming: a reality or conjecture? A systematic review

斯科普斯 背景(考古学) 农业 风险管理 系统回顾 养猪业 风险分析(工程) 业务 政治学 动物生产 梅德林 地理 生物 考古 动物科学 法学 财务
作者
Fabiano Gregolin,Késia Oliveira da Silva Miranda
出处
期刊:Animal Production Science [CSIRO Publishing]
卷期号:63 (13): 1261-1271 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1071/an22468
摘要

Context The complexity in swine production demands equally complex management actions. In this sense, risk management is an area that has been little explored and that may offer significant contributions to pork producers in their decision-making processes. Aims This study aimed to collect the available information on risks in pig farming and identify how the topic has been approached in recent studies. Methods A systematic review was conducted on the basis of searches in the Web of Science, Scopus and Science Direct databases, in the period ranging from 2015 to 2021. The searches resulted in 2178 documents on the theme risks in pig farming, which were then classified into 13 categories to represent the general objective of each study and into 177 subcategories representing the specific objective of each work. The data, separated into categories and subcategories, was not classified by any exclusionary criteria. On the contrary, they represent all the information found in the studied documents. Key results The results show that, although the number of studies on risks in pig farming is growing, the studies are contained in specific fields only. It was also possible to observe that although the studies focused on problems that may affect pig raising, they were not approached in a holistic manner using risk management methodologies that would allow identifying, measuring and managing risks in a consistent and systematic way. Thus, the studies cannot be characterised as having a risk management approach. Conclusion The studies on risks in pig farming focus on specific areas instead of using an integrated approach. It was found that risks in pig farming are a growing concern, but a holistic approach to the subject is still unexplored and could be quite fruitful, as it would make it possible to identify, measure and manage risks in a more consistent and systematic way. Implications Producers, veterinarians, managers and researchers can use the results of this study (1) to develop identification systems, and (2) in quantitative and qualitative analyses, planning, implementation of responses and monitoring of risks in pig farming.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xueyu发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
月下荷花完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
zhaohu47发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
6秒前
西啃发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
刁山山发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
半江渔火完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被1587837采纳,获得10
9秒前
SciGPT的应助被拼搏的问薇采纳,获得10
10秒前
传奇3的应助被linweiwei采纳,获得10
11秒前
yara发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
星辰大海的应助被傻子与白痴采纳,获得10
13秒前
orixero的应助被Lil_baby采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
ccjojo完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
奋斗小吕发布了新的文献求助50
18秒前
1587837完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
蓝翔高材生完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
wxy发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Plucky完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
充电宝的应助被西啃采纳,获得10
22秒前
王春梅发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
seven发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
bruce发布了新的文献求助20
25秒前
25秒前
26秒前
26秒前
小秦关注了科研通微信公众号
26秒前
Ava的应助被念汐采纳,获得10
27秒前
28秒前
29秒前
充电宝的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
29秒前
无极微光的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得20
29秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Acceptability of Printed Boards 600
The Dawn of Philology 520
Organizational Behavior 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (4th ed.) 310
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7823340
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9349846
关于积分的说明 20555097
捐赠科研通 7415904
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3333925
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2479343
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2354050