Optimising antibacterial utilisation in Argentine intensive care units: a quality improvement collaborative

医学 药方 心理干预 质量管理 药店 抗菌管理 重症监护 感染性休克 拯救脓毒症运动 败血症 急诊医学 内科学 重症监护医学 家庭医学 护理部 抗生素 严重败血症 抗生素耐药性 管理制度 管理 微生物学 经济 生物
作者
Facundo Jorro Barón,Cecilia Loudet,Wanda Cornistein,Inés Suárez-Anzorena,Pilar Arias-López,Carina Balasini,Laura Cabana,Eleonora Cunto,Pablo Rodrigo Jorge Corral,Luz Gibbons,Marina Guglielmino,Gabriela Izzo,Marianela Lescano,Claudia Meregalli,Cristina Orlandi,Fernando Perre,María Elena Ratto,Mariano Rivet,Ana Paula Rodríguez,Viviana M Rodríguez,Jacqueline Vilca Becerra,Paula Romina Villegas,Emilse Vitar,Javier Roberti,Ezequiel García‐Elorrio,Viviana Rodríguez
出处
期刊:BMJ Quality & Safety [BMJ]
卷期号:: bmjqs-017069
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017069
摘要

Background There is limited evidence from antimicrobial stewardship programmes in less-resourced settings. This study aimed to improve the quality of antibacterial prescriptions by mitigating overuse and promoting the use of narrow-spectrum agents in intensive care units (ICUs) in a middle-income country. Methods We established a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) model involving nine Argentine ICUs over 11 months with a 16-week baseline period (BP) and a 32-week implementation period (IP). Our intervention package included audits and feedback on antibacterial use, facility-specific treatment guidelines, antibacterial timeouts, pharmacy-based interventions and education. The intervention was delivered in two learning sessions with three action periods along with coaching support and basic quality improvement training. Results We included 912 patients, 357 in BP and 555 in IP. The latter had higher APACHE II (17 (95% CI: 12 to 21) vs 15 (95% CI: 11 to 20), p=0.036), SOFA scores (6 (95% CI: 4 to 9) vs 5 (95% CI: 3 to 8), p=0.006), renal failure (41.6% vs 33.1%, p=0.009), sepsis (36.1% vs 31.6%, p<0.001) and septic shock (40.0% vs 33.8%, p<0.001). The days of antibacterial therapy (DOT) were similar between the groups (change in the slope from BP to IP 28.1 (95% CI: −17.4 to 73.5), p=0.2405). There were no differences in the antibacterial defined daily dose (DDD) between the groups (change in the slope from BP to IP 43.9, (95% CI: −12.3 to 100.0), p=0.1413). The rate of antibacterial de-escalation based on microbiological culture was higher during the IP (62.0% vs 45.3%, p<0.001). The infection prevention control (IPC) assessment framework was increased in eight ICUs. Conclusion Implementing an antimicrobial stewardship program in ICUs in a middle-income country via a QIC demonstrated success in improving antibacterial de-escalation based on microbiological culture results, but not on DOT or DDD. In addition, eight out of nine ICUs improved their IPC Assessment Framework Score.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
7秒前
昭谏完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
慕青应助zhul采纳,获得10
10秒前
yhhhhh发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
不安梦桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
桐桐应助小满胜万全采纳,获得10
15秒前
所所应助霸气的梦露采纳,获得10
17秒前
科研通AI5应助ct551144采纳,获得10
18秒前
重要忆秋完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助cnulee采纳,获得10
19秒前
Andrew完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
爆米花应助昭谏采纳,获得10
20秒前
喔喔佳佳完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
蓝桉完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
恐怖稽器人完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
HMR完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
zhul发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
Yu完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
25秒前
HOMO完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
25秒前
科研通AI5应助内向的乾采纳,获得10
26秒前
李健的小迷弟应助advance采纳,获得10
27秒前
29秒前
mfy发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
DODO完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
32秒前
韩_完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
33秒前
zhul完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
cnulee发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
36秒前
37秒前
jailbreaker完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
ljcznhy发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
38秒前
碧蓝的机器猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
38秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
ISCN 2024 – An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 3000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Fashion Brand Visual Design Strategy Based on Value Co-creation 350
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3777918
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3323510
关于积分的说明 10214659
捐赠科研通 3038693
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1667611
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798220
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758315